5
2006-07-13 19:02:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by eugene65ca 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
5
2006-07-13 19:44:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
5
2006-07-13 19:08:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by TEXXBRATT 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
4
2006-07-13 19:06:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have four children. Two of them had their birthdays in August, so they started right when they turned five. One started when they were four, and the other started when they were five and a half.
The ones that started when they turned five were held back , one in second and the other in first. The one that started at four, was also held back in first, and also failed 12th grade.
The one who started at 51/2, finished with no problems at all.
Now it also depends on how well your child speaks, knows colors, can count to ten, maybe even write their own name. And how mature you think they are for their age.
For me if I could turn back the clock, I would have waited untill they were all six. But my oldest is now thirty four, and doing very well. I'm not saying my kids are dumb, but I think they could have done better if they had been older when starting. And also, school thirty years ago is different then it is now. This is my opinion, and someone else might tell you something better. But the finial decision is yours alone. Others will give you some ideas for schooling today. I don't know if they are doing test that are asking more out of kids then they did when mine went. Hope this helps you out some. Have a nice night.
2006-07-13 19:13:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mama Goose 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
that is thoroughly conventional, sexual content cloth has change right into a common element among youngsters, i began gazing round 14. Our era is way distinct from our mum and dad, celebration: our colleges initials are gh, our keeping is bypass complicated or bypass living house, we took a service vacation to Detroit and the blouse suggested GH contained in the D, which each and every and each and each and every student idea became hilarious(meaning gh in Detroit yet we understood it as bypass complicated contained in the dick, because the easy letter D has change right into a little while period for male genitalia) even as the total student body couldn't give up giggling the instructors had no clue why. ordinary stuff like this and far dirtier stuff is purely common now a days.
2016-11-06 08:50:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by gjokaj 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actuall 4 yrs. is the best. Youngest start gets the highest benefit in education because the experience levels of academics can progress at the start of the youngest age. But if you don't want 4yrs. the 5 is good too.
2006-07-13 19:04:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by rickybrit053 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have six children and all started kindergarten at 6 they have excelled in academics and one has already earned a college scholarship. Plus a large number of children are not emotionally ready to be separated from their mothers until age 6.
2006-07-13 19:17:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by osu2720@sbcglobal.net 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It depends on the child. I started at age 4 and did just fine, though other kids were older than I was and did not even pass the grade.
2006-07-13 19:05:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
5 Years Old
Your child should be graduating and going to college at age 18
2006-07-13 19:04:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by peter_swytch 3
·
0⤊
0⤋