If God didn't want us to believe in evolution, why did He fill the earth with fossils?

Question

Fossils are being found on a daily basis. Many show a strong relationship to one another as if the latter evolved from the prior.

Answer 1

The fossils do NOT prove Macro*evolution.

--
It is relevant to note that ...

There is no evidence that proves Atheistic MacroEvolution (without Intelligent Design)...

I used to believe in Evolution. However, over a period of time I have grown skeptical of the claims of Macro*Evolution... this is largely due to the weakness of the evidence for Macro*Evolution, and the fact that the evidence, rationally interpreted does not support the overarching claims made by Macro*Evolutionists...

For scientific and intellectual critiques of evolution, see http://www.godsci.org/gsi/apol/evo/00.html .

Cordially,
John

Answer 2

First, after we are dead...many years from now we too , become fossils.
And God did not scatter fossils every where to be found. Those fossils lay where the animal died. We just happen to stumble upon it.
Same as a cat and a dog, they have different bone structures,,, but resemble each other pretty much. Dose not mean one evolved from the other....
And as far as God wanting us to believe in evolution, he gave us free will to believe in what ever we want.

Answer 3

I believe that God laid the foundation. Fossils are only bone encased in earth and rock. When we die we deteriorate into bone. if you think about it we are all just living fossils. God gave us free will. we believe in what we choose to believe. Evolution is a gradual process in which something changes into a different and usually more complex or better form. If we believe we were created by God is it such a stretch to believe that God has been with us every step of the way changing us and molding us into better, stronger, more adapted humans.

Answer 4

if you notice the layers in between the fossils are like the pages of a book for starters. layer after layer ,page after page. we are still quibbling over how old the world much less the universe is by our standards.
read the older versions of most versions of various religions and there is references to other beasts that resemble the dinasous whose remains we find presurved in the ground. when the next page turned these were mostly whiped out along with the trees and were ground into the oil that we use so freely and which there is only so much of.
also the phrasing in the jewish/christian bibles has god say go forth and replenish the earth. replenish it from what? the eradacation of any previous forms of life that didn't work out?

Answer 5

sensible layout and evolution are collectively unique options. you've self belief one or you agree for the different. there isn't any in-between. the perception of evolution has not something in any respect to say about how "life got here to be on earth." That concern is the learn of abiogenesis. not all and distinctive prefers to chanced on his beliefs on information. some people do not care about information; creationists are an party.

Answer 6

And yet not a single one of those fossils is in any way an intermediate form from one species to another. Worse, not a single gene shows an intermediate form from one species to another even in simple organisms like bacteria forced to undergo millions of generations of replication.

Evolution does not happen. It has failed every single scientific test or other observation into the matter. Worse, there have been many frauds discovered in the attempt to support evolution. It's junk science.

The bottom line is we have absolutely no clue how our planet went from a lifeless ball of rock to a giant, complex ecosystem. None at all.

I mean, we do know that various types of species have existed at different periods of time while others have not. But, the evidence shows that they just appear and disappear, rather suddenly, I might add. What we absolutely do not see is a slow progression of one form to another or various subforms of the same species. When examining the fossil record, a species will be absent. Then in a blink of an eye (in terms of the life of our planet), a species appears and florishes....only to mysteriously disappear just as rapidly. This is STRONG proof against evolution.

Answer 7

""as if the latter evolved from the prior.""

AS IF is the operative word!

In Genetic mutation NO INFORMATION IS GAINED!
Things and animals never just GROW BETTER, they grow worse.

Have a good long read on the site below for some truth>>

Answer 8

Adaption. Not evolution. There is no fossil chain showing gradual changes of any animals that turned to something else.

Answer 9

That is not the case. Fossils don't prove anything. I don't think there are any fossils that show any kind of animal in an unfinished state!
There are no fossils of missing links.
There are only a few, that could be regarded as missing links but not with any certainty!

Answer 10

At least fossils prove the earth is older than 4000 years (or whatever other number of years you come up with calculating from the generations of Adam).