Hey Believers-Do you take the word of God to be totally true-or has science explained some of the BS better?

Question

So there i was listening to a show about science and the topic of discussion was the creation of the moon and I heard their relevant theories which was one more than when I was a kid and I figured it out-I now know how the moon was formed-I know and they don't-I am a genius and I am not understood by this world because I can see things that they don't. The 3 theories involve "Simultaneou Creation" where both the moon and the earth formed together-that was ruled out- "The Capture Theory" where the earths gravitational pull pulled the moon in and it was captured like Jupiter has done to several of its moons-ruled out-so that the theory that persisited was the "Sudden ImpacT" where something hit the earth and this caused a portion of the earth to fall off and be retained in orbit-this was also further analyzed because of the samples that had been brought back from the moon and they were of a silica nature meaning that oxygen had to be present and that the moon was once magma. U GO GOD!

Answer 1

""Hey Believers-Do you take the word of God to be totally true-or has science explained some of the BS better?""

Yep-- I do take the WORD OF GOD to be TOTALLY TRUE.

Science can not explain the BEST STORIES better.
~~~~~~~~~~
I still wonder, why after all these years, Science can not own up to the many bad guesses done in the name of their pseudo god Darwin!

Answer 2

When we say that the Bible is the Word of God, does that imply that it is completely accurate, or does it contain insignificant inaccuracies in details of history and science?


Some theologians teach that the Bible is inspired and authoritative, and that it is an accurate revelation of what God wants us to know about salvation - but they leave room for minor errors in non-crucial areas. One theologian, for instance, says that the Holy Spirit's work in inspiring the Bible only guaranteed "selectivity of events and accuracy of reporting and interpretation sufficient to achieve God's purpose throughout the rest of man's existence." (Dewey Beegle, Inspiration of Scripture, p. 190)
However, classic Christianity rests on the assurance that the Bible is completely accurate. It may contain statements that are (1) figures of speech; (2) non-technical descriptions; or (3) difficult to understand. But actual errors would fall into a different kind of category. If there are any errors in Scripture, no matter how small, the book can no longer be our standard of truth. I become the standard of truth, as I determine which Bible statements are right and which are wrong. And if I can't trust God to get the facts straight on things like dates and measurements (where I can check on Him), why should I expect Him to be more accurate in areas like sin and salvation (where I can't check on Him)?

The Bible doesn't use the word "inerrant," but the idea is obvious.


Psalm 19:7-9 - "The law of the Lord is perfect ... the testimony of the Lord is sure ... the commandment of the Lord is pure ... the judgments of the Lord are true forever."
Psalm 119:43 - "the word of truth."
Psalm 119:142 - "Thy law is the truth."
Psalm 119:160 -"Thy word is true from the beginning."
John 17:17 - "Thy word is truth."
An inaccurate Bible contradicts God's character quality of absolute truthfulness.

Titus 1:2 - "God who cannot lie."
Hebrews 6:18 - "It is impossible for God to lie."
Some consider this a minor issue, but the idea that the Bible contains errors opens the door to serious spiritual danger. When people decide they have the authority to label one verse as a mistake, they soon find others that they consign to the "error" category. I've watched it happen over the years. Each generation rejects more and more Scripture, as it gets in the way of their own opinions.

Author: Dr. John Bechtle
Copyright © 1995, Eden Communications, All Rights Reserved - except as noted on attached "Usage and Copyright" page that grants ChristianAnswers.Net users generous rights for putting this page to work in their homes, personal witnessing, churches and schools.

Answer 3

Genesis 1:2 And the earth was with out form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. You are right the earth did not have any form it says in the beginning of Ganesis 1:2. We now know what the earth was before it became a solid form, and it saws that God did all this in spirit.

Answer 4

Very notably galaxy photo. And convinced, isn't evolution mind-blowing for designing a range of of those marvellous chemical compounds for us. ... so the position's this data you talked about then? Are you heavily asking me to believe that considering there's a molecule formed like a flow, meaning God exists?? There are molecules formed like circles besides, some with a touch curvy line turning out to be a member of two aspects of it - that is of route the yin-yang image, therefore taoism should be the authentic faith. And the guy in the moon - that proves that God must have a face! also, some galaxies seem as if vague squiggles - what do they instruct the existence of? i'm lack of life to understand! Oh and playstation , I examine the item - in the whirlpool galaxy, the flow is created by a black hollow. imagine about this: the emblem of christianity, produced from a black hollow, an merchandise which takes all count and unendingly tries to swallow it into itself. no count how unique, alluring and favourite count is to commence with, ultimately this is in basic terms pulped and forced until eventually that's part of an undifferentiated singularity without volume. ... so in retrospect, convinced, it proves God exists, and has a exceptional experience of irony. keep searching for Jesus' face in the Doritos! he will come about finally.

Answer 5

Yes, all of Gods words are true.
To me, your theory is incomplete and doesn't seem all that reasonable. Explain to me how something could hit the earth, and knock off a piece of it that would be very similiar in proportions to the earth. If something did hit the earth and knocked it off, wouldn't it be more likely for the part of the earth that was hit to orbitting out in space right now than still in our orbit unlike the piece that hit hit? Its the pool ball effect. If you shoot a pool ball into another pool ball, the ball that is hit will travel further from the point of impact than the object that hit it.

Answer 6

Since science is incapable of examining a spirit, they don't. Any time God does a miracle it leaves science behind in a cloud of dust like a 425 cobra next to a shopping cart.

Have your fun, a scientist that is really a scientist says to me that he has no interest in trying to compare the two. You cannot do lab work on a spirit.

Molecular displacement to you.

Answer 7

aw c'mon - you know the world is flat and the sun revolves around us!

Also do not forget all the artifacts found in the tombs of the Pharos about the Jewish enslavement - Oh no evidence exists . . .
Even though the ancient Egyptians even wrote about there defeats with their spin, how would that have overlooked all the plages.

Opps, don't forget how Moses was put in a basket. too bad all evidence shows the nile would have to flow reversed, which - it never did . . .

Answer 8

God did not make religon man did ,We dont know what is accurate in the bible since it has been tampered with over the15 hundred years by popes and politics useing the parts they like and hideing the rest they didnt like.
Religon is the worlds first franchise, salvation is the product, church is the store, the vatican is the home office still taking in your money, All in gods name!
The church has no say in your salvation you do.
Do you have love in your heart or hate thats the desiding factor.

Many will come in my name and many will be deceved!
Sound familiar?

Answer 9

Consider this. A group of blind people (all of them were born blind) were taken to a zoo and given the opportunity to touch an elephant. They gather around the animal and each tried to describe what an elephant was

One said: is a huge animal. He was touching the animals belly.

Another said: No it is small and skinny. He was touching its tail.

No, said another, He is long and full of soft bones. He was touching the animals trunk.

So are we, blindly contemplating the universe and trying to describe it in our own terms. Just as these blind people who had never seen an elephant tried to.

Be it from the blindfold of religion, or the blindfold of science, we are trying to see, and explain the unknown.

Answer 10

Yep, If you look at SCIENCE & The Church, they've been butting heads for many lifetimes. The majority of fanatic Christians don't even believe what has been proven by science... Won't even give it a maybe.I'm with you buddy....Science is mightier than the try to figure it out bible....maybe they can co-exist??? Don't count on it.