NO THAT DISHONOUR, WILL EVENTUALLY GO TO ONE OF THOSE COUNTRIES, THAT WANT SO BADLY TO BE RID OF ISRAEL. ISRAEL HAS GIVEN UP A HELL OF A LOT TO TRY AND GET PEACE INTO THAT REGION. IT SEEMS TO MAKE NO DIFFERENCE TO THOSE COUNTRIES THAT BORDER OR ARE NEIGHBOURS. SYRIA LEBANON IRAN PALESTINE. NOT ONE OF THOSE COUNTRIES CAN BE TRUSTED AS ISRAEL HAS NOW FOUND OUT. LEBANESE TERRORISTS CROSSED THEIR BORDER AND KILLED AND CAPTURED ISRAELI SOLDIERS. ON ISRAELI SOIL. WELL THEY HAVE ASKED FOR IT. AND ISRAEL WILL NOT BE TO LONG IN GIVING IT TO THEM. LEBANON SHOULD HAVE KEPT THEIR NOSES OUT.
2006-07-12 16:35:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
If WWIII begins as a conflict involving Israelis and Arabs, I think the blame for starting the conflict will more likely lie with the Arabs. Just look at what's happening now: Israel pulls out of Gaza (nice thing), so the Palestinians start firing missiles at Israel from Gaza and kidnap an Israeli soldier (bad thing). Then Hezbollah says, "Hey, we'll get in on this whole kidnapping thing, too!" so now Israel's having to make a stand against Lebanon. Given this habit of Arabs repaying Israelis with evil for good, I'm not sure how Israel is going to avoid having to open up a can of serious whup-@$$ on the Arabs in the near future. Our only hope may be that Israel's initial strike devastates the Arabs so badly that the Arabs can't muster enough resources to escalate the conflict into a full-scale war.
2006-07-12 19:25:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
in the end of days it wont matter when the end comes curse god for creating such capable creatures. Unless we can all maybe get along and we can pull throguh and the technolgy we will have will be able to solve all these problems, but you must also no there were always be war it is natures way to cut down the population. So when the world gets over populated there will be famine, war, and plaques.
2006-07-12 19:22:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
ok it says in the quaran " theres the sneaky jew behind the tree kill him kill him" thats a literal translation. so all islamic fundementilist who think it is divine law will try to kill all isrealis. lets hand it to the british for putting these two mortal enemies together ( isreal was a british colony where they put all the jews after world war 2) so in a way you could say hitler is the cause of all this.
2006-07-12 21:18:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by nick m 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No
The Middle Eastern conflicts are a never ending war. They have never stopped being at war. It's just a continuation.
2006-07-12 19:18:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
probably ... they may not cause it, but they'll b A cause for WWIII
... so much for the war to end all wars
2006-07-12 19:18:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Gahhhhhh 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If they attack Syria no doubt a WW3 will start.And yes Israel will be the only one responsible for this...
2006-07-17 06:48:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Tinkerbell05 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope, in my opinion we are currently fighting in world war III, and Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, terrorism are the culprits.
2006-07-12 19:18:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by Ice 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO!! It'll be the two terrorist organizations; HAMAS and HEZZObolah and IRAN and SYRIA!!!
2006-07-12 19:21:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by Vagabond5879 7
·
0⤊
0⤋