Why do Military Generals wait until retirement to publicly criticise Rumsfeld?

Question

If they had spoken up sooner, maybe we wouldn't have over 2000 dead soldiers?

Right?

wow -

someone stooped so low as to call these people, who have dedicated most of their lives to protecting this country "WHINERS"

thats something...

Answer 1

If they had spoken up sooner, we will still not have heard about it, and they would have lost their jobs, or they would have been transferred to a place where they would not have the opportunity to make a statement heard again.

Whistle-blowers are always more prevalent after someone leaves a dangerous or illegal situation. That's why there are laws to protect whistle-blowers who are still at their companies against retribution.

I wish it were that easy to not have wasted all those lives. It seems the current administration, esp Rumsfeld, is doggedly determined to stay in this obscene war no matter what the cost in human lives and suffering.

Answer 2

6 Generals have come forward to criticize Rumsfield.
That is 2% of 1% of Generals serving & retired. There are always whiners in every group. These whiners received the rank during Demoratic years. Did you think they would could out of the military saying "I have changed, I am a Republican for the first time in 60 years". The records is overwhelming at .02 to 99.98.

Answer 3

Have you heard of the unified chain of command. When an order is given from superiors, they are followed. It's what wins wars.

Soldiers are trained to do unthinkable acts, eg. pushing the buttons for nuclear war (extreme example). It's what they're trained to do. They don't have the luxury to listen to hunches, hairs on the back of their necks, little green men, its not that generals like kiss-*sses, but if you got something to say, say it in private, otherwise shut the f*ck up!!....a victorious army is a disciplined army.

They are there to protect democracy, not practice it.

Answer 4

Its the same thing in the civilian world. You dont criticise your boss while you are working for them. Its kind of disrespectful. Also you dont criticise the cooperation you work for if you are a civilian, because that wouldnt make any sense. If military officers dont like the atmosphere they can choose to resign.

Answer 5

the in basic terms reason Rumsfeld continues to be round is because if Bush fires him or accepts his resignation then Bush sends the sparkling message that Rumsfeld is incompetent and there is a difficulty with the warfare. If the Bush administration cleans homestead and receives rid of Rumsfeld then each and every man or woman disenchanted with the warfare now has even extra ammo hostile to the administration. At this aspect, Rumsfeld won't be able to quite make it any worse, so why remove him. the problem is a ways previous salvaging and the administration is in simple terms waiting to get out of workplace and hand this disaster off to some different person by using the undeniable fact that's sparkling that they do no longer have a clue as to what to do to fix it. As in the event you imagine Batiste and a range of of alternative generals must have spoken up formerly the invasion you're patently overlooking countless key data. First, senior score militia contributors did supply Rumsfeld and the Pentagon very sparkling checks of the aptitude problems with the invasion of Iraq. They were both skipped over or brushed off from responsibility......Shinseki ring any bells? 2d, I served in the first Infantry branch lower than Batiste in Iraq and in my opinion briefed him on countless activities. aspect being, uniformed militia officials even as on lively responsibility are literally not allowed by the Uniformed Code of militia Justice from speaking out hostile to politicians. inspite of if he needed to inform Rummy what he idea-about him he couldn't without getting thrown in penitentiary. to those who ask why he did not renounce formerly the deployment that's common. no longer one man or woman in the first Infantry branch (which include myself) became allowed to get out of the militia or renounce. My time in service were given prolonged 10 months. i will in basic terms imagine what ought to have surpassed off to any favourite who requested to retire formerly his unit became deploying!!! besides to killing his occupation he ought to were advised to get on the airplane like anybody else.

Answer 6

Because, they were in the spot light before - after retirement, they are looking for attention again - trying to focus on negitive media comments so that the world will look at them again. They dont care about our soldiers.

Answer 7

They remember when General MacArthur went public against Truman during the Korean War and got canned for it.

Answer 8

You violate articles of the UCMJ and can be court martialed. Its strange how you volunteer to support the rights and protections of the constitution, and while you are doing that-they don't apply to you.

Answer 9

It is called a KNIFE in the back and get even time because he did or said something they didn't like. Everybody hates their boss. They can make millions on hating their boss but we can't get a dime for hating ours.

Answer 10

It's illegal for people in the military to publicly criticize their commanders.