if not... what are your thoughts?
2006-07-12 03:20:46 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
the da vinci code is NOT REAL....dan brown did all the writing just for the hell of it....it's FICTION...he made everything up based on this sights on the art of da vinci....he published it as FICTION
2006-07-12 03:40:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
There are suggestions (such as the dead sea scrolls) that things in the Bible may not be entirely based on the events of the times. After all, it was basically written by politicians, politicians of religion. They have the same motives as the politicians of today, and will twist the truth to serve their purpose. Yet, it still seems that there is no real proof that it happened like that. I do think that the Da Vinci Code is a work of fiction, someone's imagination at work. It was a good book anyhow.
2006-07-12 03:50:52 · answer #2 · answered by kThanks. 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i ought to say he does alot of heritage study!!I study the Da Vinci Code,i became slightly disenchanted.i love non-fiction,his e book became surely fiction with some historic truths.some were documented some purely hypothesis.i became by no potential fairly fascinated contained in the Holy Grail theory.i'm Agnostic and into metaphysics,i could not care a lot less no matter if Jesus became married or no longer.
2016-11-06 06:22:22 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the author himself said that the da vinci code was a fiction story when he first wrote it.
people are taking too far, and claiming it to be truth. This is a classic example of the ignorance of the masses. people will believe what they want to believe, or what they fear to be true.
2006-07-12 03:26:14 · answer #4 · answered by Erick 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, its just another excuse to make a couple million dolllars for the fat cats in Hollywood. Ever heard the expression, "a little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing" If it had been God's purpose to have Christ have children it would have happened.
Leaders in Europe ( was it the French) were just looking for a reason to give their King
an edge by saying he was the descendant of Christ.
2006-07-12 03:28:27 · answer #5 · answered by Ahab 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Honestly, I think it's utter bollocks. Any man who writes so crappily as Dan Brown cannot possibly know what he's talking about when it comes to history. I'm not even Christian and I have a hard time believing that garbage.
2006-07-12 03:24:15 · answer #6 · answered by Santclair 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think some of the facts r true.afterall Lord Jesus was also a human, he could also hv had a wife n kids.he is considered as a God nt a Saint.saints hv a diff life,away frm this world.I really think the facts in the book r true except a few of them.there r always some add-ons in the book to attracts readers.
2006-07-12 03:30:03 · answer #7 · answered by pri 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i have read the book and seen the movie, and pls xtian dan brown said from the first its fiction, why does is still bother pple??
2006-07-12 03:23:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
An entertaining summer read book; a mediocre movie. As to your question: it was FICTION.
2006-07-12 03:24:41 · answer #9 · answered by ElOsoBravo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You do know those books are fictious...
And go read Holy Blood, Holy Grail, he stole most of his "Ideas" from that book...
2006-07-12 03:25:24 · answer #10 · answered by Chrissie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋