English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

15 answers

Neither is right, but marrying a 16 year old can be legal if you get the parents permission. What country is Muslim? I thought that was a religon and culture.....???? You state, Muslim and American....why?

2006-07-12 03:24:59 · answer #1 · answered by Me 6 · 0 1

If those are the only two options....obviously, the Muslim marrying a 16-year old would be more acceptable. Although I can't imagine the 16-year old would be very happy marrying, what to her, would be an old man.
Rape is never acceptable by ANYONE, including an American.
It would be nice if you understood that our cultures agree on that point.

2006-07-12 03:29:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The pits of hell would be pleasant in comparison to the pain that the rapist should endure, that Muslim marrying a 16 year old girl not so much. In the United States things similar to that used to happen.

2006-07-12 03:23:05 · answer #3 · answered by SpikeBoy.com 4 · 0 0

a 50 year Muslim marrying 16 years girl

2006-07-12 03:22:11 · answer #4 · answered by Dodii 1 · 0 0

In my mind, a 16 year old girl is really a woman. But, most such weddings are not voluntary on the part of the girl, and so they amount to rape as well.

2006-07-12 03:22:39 · answer #5 · answered by lenny 7 · 0 0

Listen here-we,as Americans,DO NOT think that rape is good. If you judge us all by a few individual's acts,then you are so wrong. I don't judge any person's race, creed or color simply by the acts of a few idiots. Get your head out of your a$$ before asking a question like that in here.

2006-07-12 07:21:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

To the individuals who talk about rehabilitation, it is for drug customers, alcoholics, burglars perchance. yet no longer in any respect structure or sort murderers, rapists or scum like this. human beings like that who spout garbage like rehabilitation each and each and every of the time are failing contained in the job to guard the typical public. The regulation abiding publics rights ought to come before that of a criminal. even as will human beings learn that vengeance ought to connect a straightforward justice equipment? even as horriffic crimes like this are committed, retribution should be utilized on the perpetrators. i ask your self if the young women kin may have observed rehabilitation? Or may they instead have all of them beaten to a pulp, gang raped and disfigured with caustic soda themselves before locking them away? precisely. it truly isn't any better than what they inflicted in this youthful female, and it truly is a minimum of what those scumbags deserve. Apologies for the rant, i tried to be as well mannered as plausible. Very emotive situation.

2016-12-01 03:21:26 · answer #7 · answered by abeta 3 · 0 0

Neither

2006-07-12 03:20:57 · answer #8 · answered by FaerieWhings 7 · 0 0

that's easy.........."'50 years american raping girl of 10" or whatever the heck you're trying to say.


a stupid question deserves a stupid answer.

2006-07-12 03:24:53 · answer #9 · answered by zoo2626 4 · 0 0

Neither one

2006-07-12 03:23:29 · answer #10 · answered by tom g 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers