English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why do you or don't you care if it is?

2006-07-11 17:35:05 · 10 answers · asked by scottopherroy 3 in Health Diet & Fitness

10 answers

Not really, no. But most people confuse "genetically modified" food with food that have had genes spliced in from other plants/animals, and the two are NOT the same

Every time a farmer breeds a plant for any particular trait, you're genetically modifying it.
ALL the corn in the world is unrecognizable from the wild corn we started with. Right now, the kernels are so tightly packed, that corn cannot reproduce on it's own anymore. it NEEDS a human to continue the species. That's how much we've changed it's genes.
Origionally, Carrots were red like a beet. The colours were changed by the Dutch centuries ago.
Watermelon are MUCH bigger than origional melons, they're jucier, and sweeter, and the seeds develop later so we can offer "seedless" varieties. All of these traits are the result of modified genes.

Same with animals. There was no "wild chihuahua" packs we took in and tamed. Somewhere, WAY back there was a wolf.

Humans have been modifying the genes of plants and animals since back in the days we wore skins and hunted with stone weapons.

Now, introducing the genes from something out of species is another matter. I don't think that it's inherently bad. Frankly, the argument "We've only been testing it for a short time, and it's never been proven safe" doesn't work for me. I think that a testing protocol needs to be established, and every new modification needs to be tested by the protocol before it's introduced to the public, then a rigerous follow up needs to be done before it's declared "safe". But I don't think that it should be thrown out simply because we're afraid something unspecified might happen in the future. If people were afraid of unknown things, we'd never have left our caves.

2006-07-11 17:57:16 · answer #1 · answered by cmriley1 4 · 1 0

Of course. Why would I want to have something that is genetically engineered when for one, there hasn't been enough testing done, and two, you don't know what you are eating for sure, i.e. are you eating a tomato or a fish. What happens if you are allergic to fish? Or any other thing like that they engineer. The gov't tells you it is safe, but I learned a long time ago, that the gov't does what is good for the gov't, and no more. So what is the next generation going to be like? Hmmm. Guess we will have to wait and see won't we. Of course then it will be too late for the ones that didn't care.....

2006-07-11 17:56:51 · answer #2 · answered by bettyboop 6 · 0 0

Genetically engineered can have benefits beyond those of "natural" plants.. like vitamin A in rice..... A cure for blindness of certain types for almost NO investment. Resistance to disease that obviates the need for toxic pesticides and enhanced nutrition. Yep. I care. Bring it on!

2006-07-11 17:51:45 · answer #3 · answered by blackfangz 4 · 0 0

Yes. Organic - I want all the nutrition nature intended. Plus, I swear it's the hormones in the milk that's making kids bodies mature/grow sooner with each generation. It's scary.

2006-07-11 17:39:22 · answer #4 · answered by Tygirljojo 4 · 0 0

in spite of her answer being voted down, I actual ought to believe Nicole C. the significant reason maximum cancers prices are starting to be is because each and every individual is living longer than they were one hundred or maybe 50 years in the past. contained in the 20 th century human beings were a procedures better in all probability to succumb to infectious diseases consisting of influenza and pneumonia than to stay lengthy adequate to get maximum cancers. maximum cancers is led to by technique of mutations contained in the DNA and considering DNA is being replicated someplace on your body at any given time, the longer you stay the better in all probability you're to augment some maximum cancers. As for the question of genetically changed meals, i in my view don't have from now on some thing adverse to it. in spite of media paranoia about 'frankenfoods,' there are actual no analyze proving they have a detrimental result on human health. quite a few analyze element at damage to the community environments the position genetically changed vegetation are grown, yet even those analyze have incorrect designs. those who're large petrified of eating genetically changed meals have a tendency to no longer quite understand how those meals are created. before each and everything, human beings were genetically enhancing foodstuff because the first farmers all started breeding their vegetation to be hardier, to undergo better and tastier fruit or prettier flora. virtually each and each and every of the flora you be conscious were changed from their unique sorts by technique of human beings. the only distinction is that we now have the technologies to completely insert genes to modify those features. there is also a lot hype about say, fish genes being placed into the DNA of potatoes. yet you should appreciate that when you've that small piece of DNA from the fish, there is no longer some thing inherently fish-y in it. we've an similar DNA as fish, as flora, and virtually all existence in the international. The DNA purely codes for distinct features. So if you're technically placing DNA derived from a fish right into a plant, you do no longer make some type of mutant fish-potato. For better info of the benefits and the skill disadvantages of genetically changed organisms, i tips the web website lower than.

2016-12-01 02:50:49 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Yes, That is why I have my own farm, I hunt whenever I can, have my own garden, drink only water from my well, and live in the middle of nowhere. . . . Except for electricity and phone line. . . . Off the grid is always better.

2006-07-11 17:39:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I majorly care. I'm an organic girl all the way!

2006-07-11 18:03:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

organic all the way, it tastes much better to me, and its much healthier

2006-07-11 17:38:45 · answer #8 · answered by peacebro167 2 · 0 0

Ask the head on my left shoulder,............I'm busy right now .

2006-07-11 17:48:33 · answer #9 · answered by frith25 4 · 0 0

YESSS, organic for me please, THANK YOU

2006-07-11 17:36:57 · answer #10 · answered by Rocio F 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers