of terrorist who tourture and mutilating the bodys U.S.soldiers and we worry about the rights of terrorist at gitmo
2006-07-11 11:38:38 · 11 answers · asked by pizzapizza 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Neddie has no clue. These guys don't fall under the Geneva Convention. Take a look at the conduct of warfare.
Then go drink some more kool aid.
2006-07-11 12:03:20 · answer #1 · answered by Ronald H 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
It is the same old story, if the news can make the President or the military look bad it will not be reported. It seems some people do not believe they lost two elections and move on. If you see what happened in India on 7-11-06 you will realize that we are in the middle of World War Three. The sooner we all realize this then we will be able to make progress to end this the right way.
2006-07-11 19:18:43 · answer #2 · answered by Thom 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it's not a mistake to think people don't care about both. I hear nothing but military, Bush, and America bashing from the lefties. I have yet to see them post anything about how bad the terrorists are, or how they hate Saddam for assisting terrorists, or even how they hate Saddam for persecuting and raping women. They didn't even have outrage about the beheadings. They become strangely silent on these topics.
The only time they mention terrorism (which they usually call insurgents or freedom fighters) is when they're claiming that Bush created it.
2006-07-11 18:44:47 · answer #3 · answered by Farly the Seer 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no outrage because the victims were:
1) American and
2) Soldiers.
When has a 'human-rights' group done anything to protect Americans?
BTW neddie - can you _quote_ one rule in the Geneva Conventions that we have violated? (Don't worry - nobody else can either.)
2006-07-11 18:46:03 · answer #4 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You know what, I know this sounds awful, but quite frankly I could care less about their rights. As many innocent people as they've killed, they deserve what they get. Those British soldiers that got in trouble for beating that one guy, shouldn't have gotten in trouble in my opinion. Because, had it been the other way around, they probably would've cut a British or American soldier's head off.
2006-07-11 18:43:25 · answer #5 · answered by luckyirishgirl2004 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Really and truely ~ we don't want the TRUE level of outrage in the USA to get out of control. If you don't see the outrage over both, you're NOT looking.
2006-07-11 18:46:24 · answer #6 · answered by friojc 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Plenty of people are outraged at both. It is a mistake to assume that people care only about one or the other.
2006-07-11 18:40:28 · answer #7 · answered by Fred 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What are you getting at. There is plenty of rage. Why don't we protest the arrogant bastard Bush for keeping our troops in harms way in a country we are not welcome? Do you see his kids in uniform?
2006-07-11 18:42:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am not worrying. but there needs to be justice to either clear our soldiers or punish them for wrong doing....They are representing our country,
2006-07-11 18:43:48 · answer #9 · answered by loligo1 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if the US does not uphold the Geneva Convention,,, then we all become terrorists
2006-07-11 18:43:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋