English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

In SED TVs , each pixel is generated by its own set of electron emitters.
Doesn't that mean they will have native resolution?

2006-07-11 11:35:53 · 7 answers · asked by mustermark 1 in Consumer Electronics TVs

If it is no , can you please explain why?
You can read about SED TVs here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface-conduction_Electron-emitter_Display

2006-07-11 11:48:15 · update #1

I am sorry there must be a misunderstanding , I am not asking the resolution of SED TVs.What I am asking is will they display different resolutions other then their native resolution using interplotation techniques like LCD screens.

2006-07-12 10:14:18 · update #2

7 answers

From the sources that I've read, the first production SED displays are supposed to be full HD 1080p resolution: 1920 x 1080 pixels. However, the first demonstration prototypes sound like they were not full HD resolution.

2006-07-11 14:04:28 · answer #1 · answered by Knowledge Seeker 6 · 0 0

With LCD, DLP and even some Plasmas now coming out with 1080p resolution, it would make no sense to introduce a new technology (which is supposed to beat the pants off of any other) with less than 1080p.

2006-07-11 18:43:41 · answer #2 · answered by gp4rts 7 · 0 0

believe it will have a native res of 1920 x 1080p. I read theoretical contrast levels will be around 100,000: 1.

2006-07-11 13:21:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

because it has grow to be pg the tale strains are a lot a lot less wonderful you could tell that it is not an same the way they carry out and it has grow to be very boring and predictable its not about underclothes contests or lesbian storylines or maybe vulgar promos its very just about extra valuable storylines without regulations and also you could definetly tell there are regulations their turning a commonly used educate right into a touch ones in common words educate very just about. fyi im not a cena hater yet he wasn't extremely round in the course of the body of ideas era im fantastically particular and if he replaced into he replaced into purely starting up out in the business enterprise and in no way on correct, and jeff hardy replaced right into a correct tag crew/ mid card wrestler and extremely time-honored in the course of the body of ideas era notwithstanding he wasn't a correct guy. that replaced into even as the rock and austin were in the wwe and the right superstars. BQ: it really is a touch disapointing because i extremely needed to work out morrison being pushed and Jericho ought to've given him that push he necessary and ought to've made a good feud. Edit: WOW those comments are nerve-racking me, some like the Rock's are real those that are putting forward that the folk who beloved the body of ideas era are not real followers that's b.s. follow ROH in case you want to in common words watch wrestling yet real followers of the WWE are followers of the action the storylines the genius Vince McMahon, those who genuinely locate it wonderful in the PG era and believe it is extra valuable than the body of ideas era with the greats like Austin Undertaker Michaels The Rock and such distinct extra are purely common stupid and in no way real followers in any respect. body of ideas era is what the WWE and Vince McMahon is all about.

2016-11-01 21:14:48 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

what do you mean SED TV's?

2006-07-11 11:38:54 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

I dont think so.

2006-07-11 11:38:41 · answer #6 · answered by pbmaze 3 · 0 0

no

2006-07-11 11:37:19 · answer #7 · answered by anonymous 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers