Probabilistic calculations reveal that the probability of even the simplest protein molecules achieving the right sequence by chance is zero.
2006-07-11 11:27:01 · 11 answers · asked by Biomimetik 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
people who are ignorant enough to deny God existence can believe that the law of coincidence can create anything and everything,except for a God, so why can't we just assume ( for the sake of argument only ) that God came by the same method by which this universe came to existence.
If I said so ,would you believe in God ?.
{of course God is the creator of every thing and every law , and can't be created ,but I'm trying to use their way of thinking to Show them how mislead they can get.}.
2006-07-11 21:01:21 · answer #1 · answered by lily 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Actually he's correct in this, the questions needs to be asked, what came first, complex protiens or DNA, which forms complex proteins, which DNA is made out of? Wait, wouldn't that mean that DNA and the complex proteins that it is made out of would have had to form at the same time, since only DNA can form complex proteins using the cell of an organism? Wait, here is another problem, DNA needs a nuclear cell in order to produce complex proteins, which is what is made into other DNA strands, well and RNA strands too, so we also need a fully functional cell to have been there at the same time, before DNA could have formed, before complex protein strands could have formed, etc, but, cells are made of complex proteins that are assimilated and controlled by DNA, RNA, and Nuclei. So, we need a fully functional cell to create protein strands, DNA, RNA, and other cells. Hmm. A DNA strand can't be bound together unless the right combinations of protein are there to bind the chemicals together, and DNA can only be formed by other DNA, which are also only formed by other DNA. So we need a fully functional DNA strand to even put together a DNA strand. This all seems to lead to the same place. Too bad they don't really teach cell biology in high school, more kids might start to wonder about the circular reasoning in current evolutionary theories.
2006-07-11 18:43:02 · answer #2 · answered by RYAN P C 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did you know that the probability of a god existing fully formed and uncaused is only 1 in 10^13,427,964?
Yes it's true folks - It's been scientifically calculated and verified to over 6 billion decimal places. The probability of an intelligent god just existing fully formed and functional with no cause or origin is so infinitesimally small that it has to be rejected as utterly impossible.
By a spooky coincidence, it's exactly as likely as if a tornado swept through an junkyard and threw together a fully formed Boeing 747, complete with passengers... and 57 different versions of the Holy Bible. You'd have to be completely nuts to believe this could happen!
2006-07-11 18:30:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
hahahahaha i dont know who told you that, but its obvious he/she has no idea of probabilistic theory
that is the bullshitest thing i have read here, and ive sure read a lot, do some research and then feel sorry for having been so ignorant
edit. to the actually smart guy who posted before me, look up for the modern theories of myhtocondrial, celular and early biological evolution at wikipedia, it all could have stared with just RNA
2006-07-11 23:37:35 · answer #4 · answered by yupi666 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
icarus you are assuming that God was created. God wasnt created he existed for ever. He has always existed. People need to break out of the their perception of time when talking about God. God has no time. He exists eternally. Future, Past, and present it's all happening at the same time. Our past was somebodies present and our future will be somebodies present but they are all experiencing it NOW. If people have done any study relating to time they would understand this. It makes God that much more concievable. Einstien believed in God.
2006-07-11 18:36:56 · answer #5 · answered by Secretary G 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
*sigh* It's a chemical reaction, dimwit. I'm no more surprised that atoms can come together to form a molecule (which is all dna is) than I am that water can freeze. Shall we ask how water "knows" when to freeze?
2006-07-11 18:31:33 · answer #6 · answered by The Resurrectionist 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well if you've got a few millions of years, you might get a result...sigh...
RYAN P C, did you know it's a sin to lie? That's a cut and paste from one of the 'evolution is a myth' xtian sites. I know 'cos I read it MYSELF just the other day...college, yeah, rii-iight...
2006-07-11 18:30:41 · answer #7 · answered by googlywotsit 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Really bud, and you are a biochem major I assume.
Haha, its funny reading people who clearly barely know basic biochemistry pretend to know anything about it.
2006-07-11 18:33:38 · answer #8 · answered by champben2002 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Okay, you get started. I'll catch up with you later.
When scientists looked deeper into this argument, they found it shockingly 'empty'.
2006-07-11 18:31:07 · answer #9 · answered by XYZ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's not like randomly putting together characters. There are rules.
Sorry about that.
2006-07-11 18:33:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋