Like he did 2000 years ago. What do you think would be apropriate punishment this day to use instead crucifiction? As my Understanding it would have to be painfull and bloody so every1 would get a msg that GOD sens his only begatten son to die for our sins.
2006-07-11 10:30:03 · 14 answers · asked by PicassoInActions 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
People would probably condemn him as a model of outdated thinking, and he'd eventually earn life in prison from charges of disturbing the peace, lol.
2006-07-11 10:36:55 · answer #1 · answered by C_Dawg 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Read a different book! Put down that Bible and read something else...really.
Maybe you could start with the now 170 year old title "The Origin of Species" written by the Rev. Charles Darwin...yes he was an Anglican priest. This is a dangerous text because it blows the concept that Humans were some how "created" separately from everything else.
Or perhaps something from the last century...you know the 20th century..that seems to have passed you by. "A Brief History of Time" by Stephan Hawking...which probably has way too much math...so I'm sure you will avoid the headache.
Ok...How about this...find some used college textbooks like "Biology 101", "Basic Physics", "Chemistry 101" and "Physical Geography 101"
...get tuned up a little...and quit reading authors from 5000 years ago when the world didn't know sh**.
2006-07-11 10:59:03 · answer #2 · answered by Perry L 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
many religious human beings say that Jesus is God. some declare that God is a Trinity. in accordance to this preparation, “the daddy is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Spirit is God, and yet there are literally not 3 Gods yet one God.” that's held that the three “are co-eternal and co-equivalent.” (The Catholic Encyclopedia) Are such perspectives maximum proper? Jehovah God is the author. (Revelation 4:11) he's without beginning or end, and he's almighty. (Psalm ninety:2) Jesus, on the different hand, had a beginning. (Colossians a million:15, 16) concerning God as his Father, Jesus reported: “the daddy is higher than i'm.” (John 14:28) Jesus also defined that there have been some issues neither he nor the angels knew yet that were accepted in basic terms by his Father.—Mark 13:32. besides to, Jesus prayed to his Father: “enable, no longer my will, yet yours ensue.” (Luke 22:forty 2) To whom became Jesus praying if now to not a larger Personage? besides to, it became God who resurrected Jesus from the lifeless, no longer Jesus himself. (Acts 2:32) of route, the daddy and the Son were no longer equivalent formerly Jesus got here to the earth or for the period of his earthly existence. What about after Jesus’ resurrection to heaven? First Corinthians 11:3 states: “the right of the Christ is God.” in truth, the Son will continuously be in subjection to God. (a million Corinthians 15:28) The Scriptures therefore instruct that Jesus isn't God Almighty. instead, he's God’s Son. The so-observed as 0.33 man or woman of the Trinity—the holy spirit—isn't someone. Addressing God in prayer, the psalmist reported: “in case you deliver forth your spirit, they're created.” (Psalm 104:30) This spirit isn't God himself; that's an lively stress that he sends forth or makes use of to finish inspite of he needs. by technique of it, God created the actual heavens, the earth, and all residing issues. (Genesis a million:2; Psalm 33:6) God used his holy spirit to inspire the adult men who wrote the Bible. (2 Peter a million:20, 21) The Trinity, then, isn't a Scriptural preparation.* “Jehovah our God is one Jehovah,” says the Bible.—Deuteronomy 6:4.
2016-10-14 09:06:31 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First of all, Jesus isn't coming back. He is dead! Second that is hardly a question. Third, not everyone would get the message that GOD was sending his only begatten son to die for us. Why? Because do we all woreship Jesus? Newsflash, there are Jews, Buddists, hindus, muslims, Athiests and many more. Not everyone would think that.
2006-07-11 10:35:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jesus does not have to come in sacrifice ever again, that was the final sacrifice for all Gods children, and when Jesus died on the cross, and was risen the tabernacle veil split in two, from top to bottom signifying that we were no longer seperated from God, because of Jesus, and the Holy Spirit can now live within us, our bodies became the tabernacle, the church to house the Holy spirit.
2006-07-11 10:35:20 · answer #5 · answered by bryton1001 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sigh..
I think the apropriate thing to do would be to thank the person who heals the sick, raises the dead, cures the blind, turns water to wine and calms the stroms..
Somehow Crusifying them just doesnt fit the crime..
2006-07-11 10:35:22 · answer #6 · answered by profit0004 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
since God is the same yesterday today and forever. I think Nothing would change.it would still be crucifiction.
2006-07-11 10:35:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He's coming?
Oh, great! Another shot at experiencing even more sins.
Some sins feel too good to miss, I cannot imagine what other sins still await us.
2006-07-11 10:34:59 · answer #8 · answered by Subterfuge 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Jesus will do so then HE will also merge into sin and I will get chance to play football with HIM in the hell.
2006-07-11 10:34:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
HE did it ONCE! That's enough for all, Past, Present, and Future.
The word Excruciating is still used today - it is/was the most painful of all.
2006-07-11 10:33:52 · answer #10 · answered by whynotaskdon 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋