Feel free to express why you would or wouldn't.
2006-07-11 10:15:17 · 9 answers · asked by Trixi Curious 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
It wouldn't make any difference. The biochip isn't the mark of the wild beast as some superstitious church goers would tell you.
2006-07-11 10:17:52 · answer #1 · answered by johnusmaximus1 6 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Are there any biochips for humans yet?
I sincerely doubt it. Perhaps world leaders and such but to be quite honest, the technology required is WAAAY to expensive to implement.
Your doomsday myths will just have to wait I'm afraid...
2006-07-11 17:20:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldnt biochip my child for the same reason I wouldnt walk around disneyland with my child on a leash. They are children, not animals or cars that you lojack.
2006-07-11 17:20:12 · answer #3 · answered by JustJake 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I might; as long as it wasn't some sort of transmitter, and as long as it wasn't necessary to buy and sell with. It'd be a good way to identify a body =(
2006-07-11 17:20:24 · answer #4 · answered by C_Dawg 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Never! Freedoms and the concept on annonymity are dissolving quickly enough without "tagging" yourself for whomever to track or monitor as they please. The very idea is creepy.
2006-07-11 17:21:29 · answer #5 · answered by livysmom27 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont know why religious groups should have problems with it.
2006-07-11 17:31:26 · answer #6 · answered by kevin k 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no i trust my child like my parents trusted me. i know whatever he or she does will not take his /her life in vain, other than that i don't care.
2006-07-11 17:22:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I would fingerprint though.
2006-07-11 17:18:26 · answer #8 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, if finances would allow it.
2006-07-11 17:19:29 · answer #9 · answered by Pretty Princess 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋