Who else here thinks Homosexuals are doing a good job fighting overpopulation, by chooseing a fruitless union?

Question

By fruitless, I mean no kids (Duh) I know the bible say it's bad, but it also outlines slavery guidelines. So, can't that part be out-dated as well. I'm not gay, just supportive of those who are. Thanks

actually I'm a floridian, born and raised

Answer 1

heh-heh... fruitlessness through fruitiness... heh-heh

sad thing is most would probably make better parents than a lot of the people who do have kids.

Answer 2

Well I wouldn't say they were doing a GOOD JOB. I mean that's like saying it's a job. If they are happy, then leave them alone. It's not your (by your, I mean the public) business. I'm not gay, but I'm all for it. They can adopt and have kids that way. Or if it's two guys, they can have someone be a surrogate mother or two girls can use someone's donated sperm. I mean... It's not like they really chose to be gay. If you're born attracted to the same sex as yourself, you don't want to pretend to like the opposite sex just to make other's happy. Was that well said or what?! Gotta love the gays and how they have still held on strong all these years.


EDIT::
Well, for all those saying you'll regret it when you die, "Christian Girl," I don't know much about the Bible, but I'm sure they don't want you going around insulting people and telling them off for not having the choice of sexual preference. And that is my reason for not being Christian. The beliefs are ridiculous. People can't be gay? Then why did this so-called God make people gay? Hmm.. something is iffy there!!

Answer 3

Yes I think so. I also think that homosexuals who may not have biological kids and therefore aren't reproducing (and thereby creating new children and thus putting more demands on the Earth and its resources) are also fulfilling a role whenever they adopt children or take care of foster children (a friend of mine who was raised in the foster care system often calls the kids "the forgotten ones" because he was passed around so much, he even said he would have been happy even if a loving gay couple adopted him or let him stay with them just to have some sort of stability and love in his life).

Answer 4

The anti-homosexual stance is based on the erroneous notion that the only purpose for sex is reproduction. Sex serves a lot of other purposes. Heterosexuals who use contraception should ask themselves why gay couples can't also give each other pleasure, solace, and intimacy without biological reproduction.

And I would say, too, that besides adoption, etc., gay couples can be profoundly "productive." They produce joy, always a good commodity in this world. They produce homes, human warmth, hospitality. Their love can be just as creative and fruitful as heterosexuals'.

And I'm a Christian, BTW.

Answer 5

Ummm....... you've made an assumption about Homosexuals< I do believe. None of the Homosexuals I have ever met said that they "Chose" to be a Homosexual. That being said, I do believe they play their part in the Evolutionary Process. And yes they do help a little with the population explosion.

Answer 6

If you think homosexual couples are helping stem overpopulation, you have been reading the wrong literature.

Same sex couples are having children every day. If it is a male/male couple, they have been known to have one of them donate sperm to fertilize a surrogate mother's eggs. She bears the child and gives it to the biological father.

Female/female couples simply go to a sperm bank and have one of the women impregnated or they get a willing donor to give his sperm in the "usual" way.

I'm not against gay couples, just think people should get their facts straight.

Answer 7

I'm glad to see that you're on the right side, but I don't agree with your question. Gays can and do reproduce.

I on the other hand am doing MY part to curb overpopulation! No seed shall ever take hold in my womb.

Answer 8

We owe a great debt of gratitude to those among us who have by either nature or choice, chosen not to add to the misery of Humanity by adding un-needed additional mouthes to feed. The next step is to get rid of all the religions that are having a competition to see which one can out-breed the other.

Answer 9

Thanks for your support, Rach! However, I think that the percentage of gays worldwide is so small that I don't think that we really have an effect on the population. However, I do think that many gay and lesbian individuals provide a lot of good to the world in the arts, sciences, and social sciences.

Answer 10

Never thought of it that way, good point. I guess they just adopt kids huh, so they are sort of like the people who enjoy getting pets from the human society instead of a buying them elsewhere. Go homos!

Answer 11

Lol, they don't love eachother for the purpose of saving the world, but your statement is valid. And they could sure help to empty the orphanages a little bit.