English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'm looking for a government or academic reference that addresses this question.

2006-07-11 07:06:07 · 16 answers · asked by MyCowsCanFly© 5 in Society & Culture Community Service

RcaBrave...

I understand your logic. I know your facts are accurate. Well done. Thank you.

However, I'm looking for a citation or reference in the literature or in statutes that specifically addresses this question.

I've looked. I haven't found anything specific. Have you found anything?

2006-07-11 07:47:41 · update #1

16 answers

No they aren't homeless, ther are just too poor to afford a good home.

2006-07-11 07:09:31 · answer #1 · answered by The_Devil_911 3 · 0 3

Most communities in the USA have vagrancy laws that pertain to living in an RV or camper parked on public streets.

In general an RV can be considered a home if located in registered mobile home or RV park or in an area zoned r-3 (an area that allows multi-family housing such as an apartment complex) and only then if it is replacing an existing mobile home.

As a rule of thumb if the local post office will deliver mail to your RV you are not considered homeless.

RV's are allowed on private property (unless designated differently by subdivision restrictions) but may not be lived in. RV's are allowed in Mobile Home Parks and RV parks other than there.living full-time in RV's is illegal most places, but not strictly enforced.

During special events (festivals, sporting events, etc.), they may be lived in for up to 24 hrs. before the festival and until 24 hrs. after. Now that Sam Walton is died many WalMarts have closed their parking lots to RVers.

Exceptions are carnival workers traveling with their carnival, construction workers who may stay on their construction site (with limitations) and short term (72 hrs. or less) transient visitors staying with property owners on their property.

2006-07-11 07:35:00 · answer #2 · answered by rcabrave 2 · 2 0

Seems to depend on whose definition, the folks doing it, or the jurisdictions through which they travel. Legally it would appear they are considered homeless unless they have a street address at which to receive mail. Skid-row rental should serve for that.

2015-12-18 05:39:43 · answer #3 · answered by anarkissed 1 · 0 0

i'd supply all people a hug in the experience that they necessary one . human beings are human beings and favor respect inspite of status in existence, outfits maketh no longer the guy, a large number of situations on the city i stay ive offered nutrients and a drink for someone who became soliciting for loose replace, there are a decision of rationalization why someone falls on difficult situations, yet its none of our organisation quite why

2016-10-14 08:54:19 · answer #4 · answered by Erika 4 · 0 0

obviously not, homeless people live on the streets with occasional shelter provided by the city.

2006-07-11 07:10:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I live in a van down by the river!

2006-07-11 07:09:15 · answer #6 · answered by apage123 2 · 2 0

some people like to travel after retirement and thats what they use, its still a home

2006-07-11 08:36:17 · answer #7 · answered by san_ann68 6 · 1 0

You're only homeless when you're NOT parked in a trailor park.

2006-07-11 07:09:47 · answer #8 · answered by smokingun 4 · 3 0

No, homeless is having no shelter.

2006-07-11 07:12:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

i don't think so. by the way R.Vs are really expensive too.

2006-07-11 07:57:16 · answer #10 · answered by Blackarrow 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers