Once you accept one perversion as an "alternate lifestyle", what is to stop every perversion from coming out of the closet?
I hope the guy and his horse are happy together.
2006-07-11 07:08:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
Yes, first off two rational human beings can find a meaningful deeper understanding with one another. A human and horse cannot. You may be "friends" with a dog or a cat, but would you put that friendship on the same level as with your best friend?
Second two people can consent to a sex act between themselves, a horse may not. Animal sexuality is based on a desire to reproduce while human intimacy are based on both sexuality and a need emotional connection. A horse cannot speak nor understand the consequences of sex, therefore bestiality unlike homosexuality is a non-consensual act.
Finally marriage is a partnership of equals, when you marry someone (supposedly) you are entering into a contract of duality, both people giving equally to become more than their individual selves, a horse and a man will never be equal partners.
Also your argument for reproduction as being the sole basis of a marriage is flawed, what about two people who cannot have children, or do not want them? should they be separated? What about a violent criminal man and a retarded woman should they be allowed to marry because they can produce children?
2006-07-11 07:18:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by johnjacob01 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Your question is valid. However, there is a major difference between homosexuality and bestiality.
A man can talk to a man, just as a woman can talk to a man. There is room for dialog, personal interaction and the opportunity to get to know someone on a deep level.
Christians typically think that homosexuality is only about the sex. It's not. It's about personal connection. It's about attraction. It's about love. Sex is a part of that, but it's not *all* that homosexuality is about. Really, the only difference between homosexuality and heterosexuality is that we require a bit of help to make a baby. But we find that help. And we bring children into homes that are in many cases more protective, less destructive, more loving, and more established than a great number of heterosexual households.
A man can talk to a horse, but the horse can't talk back to the man. The only dialog is one sided (with language), personal interaction is on a level of animal interaction. There is no opportunity to get to know the horse on an intimate level. By intimate, I don't mean sexual.
I pose a rhetorical question in return: Distinguish between heterosexuality and heterosexual bestiality (with a chimpanzee).
The problem isn't with your question, it's with the belief that homosexuality is a perversion and "unnatural". The problem is that some heterosexual Christians believe they are "better" than homosexuals because they feel their lifestyle is validated by God's word.
I commend you for seeking to further understand. However, only when the ideals that homosexuality is a perversion or unnatural are set aside and people truly seek to understand homosexuality on the same level as heterosexuality, will they have the ability to grasp the concept of human sexuality.
2006-07-11 07:16:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by iu_runner 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
The sweet probability free female is authentic: both are unnatural, even although 2 consenting adults are in touch. there is not any gay DNA, both. Are you saying that if a consenting man or woman animal and a consenting man or woman human were in touch, it should be maximum proper? you're questioning the way you ought to get consent from an animal? you want to visit a number of the secret stay shows suitable to a stallion and a woman. On 2d idea, you extra constructive no longer: that's certainly revolting (so i have been advised by friends who observed it).
2016-10-14 08:54:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Erika 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, homosexuality is when two same-sexed-same-species individuals go for it, and beastiality is when a human and non-human go for it (same or opposite sex).
I suppose that by your standard, any sex that does not produce a baby is in the same category as homosexuality and bestiality.
If you believe procreation is the only purpose of sex, you're missing out on a lot of good times. But I suppose that's up to you.
2006-07-11 07:11:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by lenny 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Homosexuality is between two humans of the same sex. Beastiality is as you said, sex with an animal. Homosexual couples can adopt children and are human as I have already said.
2006-07-11 07:05:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by AsianPersuasion :) 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
"Homosexual" is defined by Merriam-Websters as "of, relating to, or characterized by a tendency to direct sexual desire toward another of the same sex" or "of, relating to, or involving sexual intercourse between persons of the same sex."
It would seem, though, that it is not necessarily same sex of the same species, if we use the first definition. It seems, then, that beastiality and homosexuality could be co-existent.
-j.
2006-07-11 07:25:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by classical123 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Man is the only creature in nature breaking the natural laws set forth by God. In the wild, you don't see a rhino and an alligator having sexual relations and then justifying it. You don't see a shark and a whale trying to mate.You don't see two male lions having sex. You don't see two male birds trying to have sex. Why does man break this law, and then try and justify it? Sin, that's why. People want their favorite sexual sin to be "acceted" by the public.
2006-07-11 07:12:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Oh my! You just can't let men marry men and women marry women. Then people will marry their pet. Then their cars. Then their bank accounts. Then their red paper clips. Where does it end? Stop the madness before it begins!
2006-07-11 07:05:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Kenny ♣ 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Homosexuality is two people loving eachother. They both agree on that love.
Beastiality is one human raping an innocent animal.
the two have nothing to do with eachother.
2006-07-11 07:05:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Thinx 5
·
1⤊
0⤋