English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

Why should the U.S.? Let Japan or South Korea, they are way closer.

2006-07-11 06:04:02 · answer #1 · answered by Phil My Crack In 4 · 0 1

If that became his purpose, it should be a much extra constructive mind-set then flat out invading international places.. yet i quite don't experience that Obama's cutting-edge comments about "negotiating" are trustworthy.. Strike One: He not in any respect spoke hostile to the Iran decision, in truth he reported that each and every one techniques are on the table with Iran, which include using strikes Strike 2: He did not even hardship to vote on the KYI/LIEBERMAN law, which designates the Iranian nationwide safeguard a terrorists business organisation, If Obama felt so strongly about this, why no longer seem as a Senator and make the vote? Strike 3: international kin?? please, he tried to sponsor a law labeling the IRG a Revolutionary Organization 17 November some months decrease back If Senator Obama quite felt the favor to barter with Iran, he ought to have acted on those measures instead of very last idle... and contributing to the challenge, i.e. sponsor a bill making concerns worse... and could no longer we've tried to unravel the problem, formerly Bush placed economic sanctions on Iran? what's left to barter???

2016-10-14 08:50:41 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Yes US should not only try but make all possible efforts to kill
Kim Jong II, as it is said that we should kill the snake before it raises
its Head. Kim Jong II is not only enemy of US but he is Global Threat.
Our leaders should understand this.

2006-07-11 06:31:55 · answer #3 · answered by Gunjan Suman 1 · 0 0

How? I don't think we even have any CIA case officers in North Korea. We can't do it the easy way (ie, dropping bombs) because that would be a PR nightmare.

2006-07-11 07:16:26 · answer #4 · answered by smokingun 4 · 0 0

I'm sure with the right security clearance you'd see we are in progress of doing so. As to those of you answering we should go after Bush, you are now on the list. Be careful what you say! We are watching you.

2006-07-11 06:24:24 · answer #5 · answered by El Pistolero Negra 5 · 0 0

we should just invade and give north Korea to South Korea

2006-07-11 06:53:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I wish it was that easy. Something needs to be done and fast. Hopefully, from the looks of it, Japan will take care of him for us all.

2006-07-11 06:01:28 · answer #7 · answered by kellie 1 · 0 0

We have never tried to end conflict in such a dishonorable way.

Personally, it works for me. Sorry.

2006-07-11 06:02:15 · answer #8 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 0 0

no, but i am wondering why japan or south korea hasn't tried

2006-07-11 06:00:43 · answer #9 · answered by hell_in_a_handbasket 3 · 0 0

Look outside your country once you deal with your internal dictators... that is what I say!!!!

2006-07-11 06:01:03 · answer #10 · answered by daiunus 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers