English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I could make the argument that throwing them away is destroying life. Would God approve that or prefer they are used to try to heal the sick?

2006-07-11 03:04:48 · 7 answers · asked by Big Red 2 in Science & Mathematics Medicine

7 answers

Why is God even in this equation? If you want to make an argument about morality fine but don't include God because we shouldn't be making decisions about research based on what we think...God thinks.

It's stupid to throw away embryos that could be usefull in research. Stem cells may not be the wave of the future...but it's certainly worth exploring. Research cures and ignorance kills.

2006-07-11 04:19:50 · answer #1 · answered by Franklin 7 · 2 3

Well, if this was a straight ethics question, then the answer would depend on your views of life itself -- is an embryo to be considered potential life or actual life? Unused embryos might, in one view, be considered no different to all the spontaneously aborted embryos that die every day without the mother even knowing that fertilization had occurred (happens all the time; by one estimate I've heard, nearly 20% of all pregnancies spontaneously abort themselves within the first few weeks of pregnancy, and the mothers know nothing had happened), whereas stem cell research consciously and deliberately utilizes the embryos for scientific purposes. Using them to save another person's life when they would otherwise be allowed to die and flushed down the drain (so to speak) could be considered the best use, at least by some people; their existence served a purpose other than just to play understudy to the child that was actually brought to term. Others think it's like abortion, killing babies for science, even though as unused embryos, they would never be brought to term anyway.

However, since you did bring the G-man into the discussion, now you have to consider how an omnipotent being would regard our use of His creation, and that is not for us to say. Let's be blunt about this: we kill things. We kill animals for meat, we kill plants for vegetables, we kill each other because they have something we want... and so does everything else in nature. If you believe in God, then you have to believe that God made us this way. If using stem cells from unused embryos goes against God's plan, if it uses human tissue in a way that perverts His creation, then organ transplants are just as perverse, as are skin grafts, donor bone implants, blood donation, or about half of modern medicine, because it tinkers around with human tissues that would otherwise naturally die and return to the earth.

2006-07-11 03:22:43 · answer #2 · answered by theyuks 4 · 0 0

Research baby. Stem cells are just that... cells.
If they were human they would be called stem humans.
Stem cells are not human.. they are nothing. Just genetic material that can HELP US FIND CURES NOW.
Important research that can help us find cures for diabetes, heart disease, parkinsons, cancer... can I keep listing.
What would we do with these stem cells anyway.. we cant throw them away.. because those abortion people will come after us!
By the way, since these abortion protestors are so adamant about preserving life and a cluster of cells, can we have them raise these children... just wondering... it would make decisions easier

2006-07-11 10:35:59 · answer #3 · answered by vascsono 2 · 0 0

so 2 wrongs make a right now? destroying them in the first place will make it right?

the question should also be posed: which is worse, to kill homeless/vagrants? or to not donate their body to medical schools after?

and besides the point..... stem cell research has not really proven to be very effective, far from the future of all research and the savior of humanity that it is made out to be. the research that is being done on 'adult' stem cells has proven far more prospective and has results, not promises.

2006-07-11 03:14:30 · answer #4 · answered by jasonalwaysready 4 · 0 0

exciting question.. I had no longer concept about that previously. i'd say let what embryos are not from now on needed be used for finding out. i'm no longer adverse to throwing them out yet why no longer use them for analyze. They maximum in all probability is purely no longer used to come back to finish time period, i do not see many Christians stepping as a lot as change into pregnant by technique of those left over embryos. What are you going to do, try-tube them to existence and who will improve them? analyze... it truly is what needs to be finished.

2016-12-01 01:33:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

well what is a laboratory made embryo??
some cells fused together like any other laboratory study we do with any other animal cells ,
they are just cells,put together
there is not a baby talking to us that the clinic is going to kill
,so they made those embryos from women and man donated cells
and they should do with it what ever they need to do
god has nothing to do with the medical science ,i think there is nothing in common between science and religion

2006-07-11 07:36:00 · answer #6 · answered by qwq 5 · 0 0

It sounds to me like you trying to make your mind on this issue by what people think god would think. If that's the case, you're never going to have an answer.

According to your first question it's picking between the lesser of 2 evils. You think both of them are wrong and nothing short of God personally speaking to you and telling you that one of them is good is going to change your mind. Think about it and if you feel one of them is good then stick by that otherwise neither of them are ever going to be acceptable for you.

2006-07-12 03:47:55 · answer #7 · answered by sci-chic 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers