If muslims carry banners "Slay those who insult Islam"then what should be done to muslims for killing innocent

Question

I think even all of muslims should be slayed..If one man makes a cartoon all the muslims come out against everyone then why not all muslims should be killed for 9/11 or 7/7..Cause it was donr by muslims in the name of Allah killing infidels.

I believe its not muslim fanatics its their religion that preaches them and those who say no ..They havent read Quran.

Answer 1

An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.

That may sound drastic, but its a sign of the times we live in.

Answer 2

Christians and Jews have been killing innocent Muslims since years. The latest was the war on Iraq where the soldiers were raping and murdering women and children and only now the truth has come out. As far as what I have noticed on yahoo answers, most non-Muslims are more hateful towards Muslims than vice versa. This is because Muslims truly believe in peace and practice it.
The people who are violent Muslims are not following the proper faith. Like many other non-Muslims they are also full of hate.

Answer 3

If slaying of innocents is not permitted ,will you pray to Allah to re-surrect those killed by the Islamic raiders on their way to India and in India.Saying is easier than doing ,on one side you people say it is not permitted on the other your representatives ,Jehadis are killing en-mass.How many Muslims have condemned these killings .On the sly you are laughing and making fool of every body.

WHEN THESE PEOPLE SAY ISLAMISTS BELIEVE IN LIVING IN PEACE THEY MEAN AFTER KILLING THE INFIDELS.Mesum did the Quran specifically mentioned that eliminate the Indians by the millions only than the Islam will be safe.What he islamic raiders have done in the Hindu-Kush range ,you must be smiling under your sleeves and laughing .You forefathers may also have been converted by the raiders .There is conflict going on in your mind better say I will kill the Infidels as my forefathers have done a mistake which you can not undone and follow the Quran.

Answer 4

Muslims have the right to defend themselves and, everything else they hold dear and sacred. No one has ever made a claim of killing innocents, because it goes against the teachings of Islam. As for killing all Muslims, you have trying for over 14 centuries and, Islam just keep getting stronger. It is about time you stop and think for yourself, before our armies arrive at your doorstep. Peace.

Answer 5

Just slay every Muslim. Their Quran refers to every non-believer as a heathen. The Quran itself tells them to kill the heathen or convert them to Islam. They dont accept anyother god. So every Muslim son of a ***** should be slayed

Answer 6

brainless if some one do the same with christians or ... they will do the same in all the countries if some one(muslim christian or...)kill others they will hang him/her not because he/she is infidel or some thing like that just because that person killed some one .

Answer 7

Well.. actually if u read most of QUESTIONS in answer yahoo, READ ALL THE HATRED OF NON-MUSLIMS TOWARDS MUSLIMS.. and u combined this people together.. THEY WILL BECOME THE GREATEST TERRORIST EVER..

U wont find any MUSLIMS BASH other religions in this forum..

So, DOES THIS CONCLUDE EVERYTHING?

Answer 8

TEACHINGS OF JUDAISM AND CHRISTIANITY ABOUT WAR

... The question ... arises - Can it ever be right to fight for a faith? Let us, therefore, turn to this question.

The teaching of religion on the subject of war takes different forms... Moses is commanded to enter the land of Canaan by force, to defeat its population and to settle his own people in it (Deut. 20:10-18). In spite of this teaching in the Book of Moses, and in spite of its reinforcement by practical example of the Prophets Joshua, David and others, Jews and Christians continue to hold their Prophets in reverence and to regard their books as the Books of God.

At the end of the Mosaic tradition, we had Jesus who taught;


But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also (Matthew 5-39).
Christians have often cited this teaching of Jesus and argued that Jesus preached against war. But in the New Testament, we have passages which purport to teach quite the opposite. One passage, for instance, says:

Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword (Matthew 10:34).

And another passage says:


Then said he unto them. But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one (Luke 22:36).
Of the three verses the last two contradict the first. If Jesus came for war, why did he teach about turning the other cheek? It seems we have either to admit a contradiction in the New Testament, or we have to explain one of the contradictory teachings in a suitable manner. We are not concerned here with the question whether turning the other cheek can ever be practicable. We are concerned only to point out that, throughout their long history, no Christian people have ever hesitated to make war. When Christians first attained to power in Rome, they took part in wars both defensive and aggressive. They are dominant powers in the world today, and they continue to take part in wars both defensive and aggressive. Only now the side which wins is canonized by the rest of the Christian world. Their victory is said to be the victory of Christian civilization. Christian civilization has come to mean whatever tends to be dominant and successful. When two Christian powers go to war, each claims to be the protector of Christian ideals. The power which wins is canonized as the true Christian power. It is true, however, that from the time of Jesus to our time, Christendom has been involved-and indications are that it will continue to remain involved-in war. The practical verdict of the Christian peoples, therefore, is that war is the real teaching of the New Testament, and that turning the other cheek was either an opportunist teaching dictated by the helplessness of early Christians, or it is meant to apply only to individuals, not to States and peoples.

Secondly, even if we assume that Jesus taught peace and not war, it does not follow that those who do not act upon this teaching are not holy and honored. For Christendom has ever revered exponents of war such as Moses, Joshua and David. Not only this, the Church itself has canonized national heroes who suffered in wars. They were made saints by the Popes.

If we read Bible deeply then we can easyly understand that killing of innocent people is the teaching of Chirtanity not Islam, becouz in the time of Mohammad Muslim just defend themselfs, but after Mohammad Muslim change his teachings.

Answer 9

We memorize and read the Quran hundred of times so we know it better than you. see this link then add you opinion:

http://www.turntoislam.com/forum/showthread.php?t=21

Answer 10

u want to get reported for hateful propganda or something? Why dont u blame the christians for their acts,