English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

According to a Russian author Nicholas notawich in his book 'unknown period of Jesus Christ'.
The real tomb stone of Jesus lies in Kashmir(india).So the story of his resurrection may be false

2006-07-10 20:46:52 · 11 answers · asked by vipin ac 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

11 answers

I heard that Chrishna and Christ are similar names because of that period.

2006-07-10 20:51:03 · answer #1 · answered by brand_new_monkey 6 · 0 0

There are a couple of problems with that theory:

a) There are at least two different caves in Kashmir that allegedly are where his tomb is;
b) These legends only make an appearance during, or just before the early period of British rule; [Both for a visit between 12 & 30, and for a visit after the ressurection.]

In terms of travel, the west coast of India was 42 days of sailing from Egypt (If one caught the trade winds at the right time). There also was an overland route from Damascus, that took six to nine months. These trade routes were well established, if somewhat hard going.

This wsn't the type of trip one took on the spur of the moment. For a trader, a couple of months went into gathering provisions. For a pilgrim, tourist, or anybody but an invading army, years would be reuqired, to ensure one had enough trade goods, or money to pay the approprite taxes, and tolls. [Invading armies are exempt for those, since they usually became the rulers, and automatically exempted themsevles from such taxes.]

Whilst the tax was low, depending upon how mny communites one passed thru, it could come to very significant amount. For traders, it would be profitable, only if what they carried was compact, and highly valued. [IOW, jewels, gold, fine silk cloth.] Items that could be sold in the next wealthy village, to recoup the cost of the taxes.

Whilst his time hanging on the cross was short, thus improving the odds of him not dying, the guards who certified his death would have been crucified, had the victim survived. IOW, it was in the interest of the guard, to ensure that the victim was dead.

2006-07-11 04:42:53 · answer #2 · answered by jblake80856 3 · 0 0

The book Unknown period of Jesus Christ is false teaching, much like The DaVinci Code.

2006-07-10 21:04:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

This guy isn't the first to come up with a theory like that ,but the evidence doesn't support it. Travel wasn't as easy then as now. If Jesus did to that, then why isn't there evidence of this in His teachings?
The "real tomb" is refuted by the Bible text. Why were Joseph of Aramithea and the others in a hurry to get Jesus' body down?

2006-07-10 23:07:36 · answer #4 · answered by Buzz s 6 · 0 0

Hmm. Someone mentioned that he learned meditation techniques in India and that was the reason why he was able to bear the pain of being nailed to a cross. It wouldn't surprise me if the tomb story was true.

2006-07-10 20:52:48 · answer #5 · answered by kitt 4 · 0 0

i did not study at the moment about a 'tomb in Kashmir', yet i'm attentive to records of time spent by technique of a 'Saint Issa' that frolicked in India preaching 'one God and his prophet'. the issue with it truly is that there have been many pretend prophets operating round, purely as there are today. Jesus states he ought to visit 'different flocks' besides, and ought to have traveled very a procedures in the course of the unrecorded time in that region, some have speculated to North u.s. and previous... Neat, eh?

2016-12-01 01:16:48 · answer #6 · answered by fellman 3 · 0 0

Oh really!!! I think you will need a lot of documentations and evidences to prove your claim.

I advise you to read the Bible and you will know which places Jesus went to and who He was with during His time. The Bible has documentations and evidences to prove what it says is true.

2006-07-10 20:53:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I Have Herd This That He Traveled There And They New Him As Krishna

2006-07-10 20:53:17 · answer #8 · answered by ? 2 · 0 0

yeah, sure, you forget tha he was a carpenter, and could not afford to go off galavanting whereever he wanted through territory that wasn't Roman occupied.

2006-07-10 20:51:10 · answer #9 · answered by judy_r8 6 · 0 0

Ah sure, whatever you say man.

2006-07-10 21:01:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers