English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

We could call it the Bibran, or the Qurible.

2006-07-10 11:19:03 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

28 answers

Yeah that's a good one. Imagine all those fundamentalist, narrow minded,female dominating ,zealots, getting together. Thats what the world needs.

2006-07-10 11:27:03 · answer #1 · answered by Wise Old Witch 5 · 0 2

Just an opinion, but I think the world might do better if all of the people who read the Bible all the time or the Quran all the time just starting some other books more often as well. Why stick to just one book when there are libraries of information out there? Churches and Mosques are nice, but libraries can be pretty enlightening as well.

2006-07-10 11:30:22 · answer #2 · answered by Peace Angel 2 · 0 0

You seem to be lacking a basic concept here though both the Quran and Bible talk about Jesus(Isa in the Quran) they differ on who he is. You can't combine something that say opposite things. A dog can't be a cat and the two can't breed.

2006-07-10 11:23:19 · answer #3 · answered by havocstar 2 · 0 0

No. We should all become aware of the One True God, the Source of all Creation and learn the meanings and definitions of the "Laws of Nature and of Nature's God to abide by and convey them. The Laws of the Source of Creation are the Rights of Creation. Transgressing these Laws assures suffering. Obeying them assures a positive outcome.

Mainstream religion doesn't teach the Laws of Nature's God. Aka The teachings of Master Jesus the Christ.

Like Equality for example. Master Jesus the Christ taught equality and gender equality, in public and to women. Outlawed by the church and state at the time. Very much like now.

Catholicism and Christianity don't teach equality, nor gender equality. They deny women their God given, inherent, inalienable rights, to control their own body, and in doing so deny all human rights. What kind of mentality tries to revoke the God given, inherent, inalienable rights of humankind? Rwanda?

Muslims have no idea about equality. The have such little intelligence and self-value that they demonize women. Mohammad put a stop to them killing new born girls.

Combining the Quran and the Bible sounds like a real piece of work.

2006-07-10 11:53:47 · answer #4 · answered by Ray W 2 · 0 0

Absolutely not! The Bible and the Quran (Koran) teach very different things. (i.e. the Triune God vs. Allah, Jesus is God vs. Jesus was a prophet). Not only that, but the Muslims think they need to force their religion on everyone else and kill those who refuse. Christians do not (at least certainly should not) force our beliefs on others. We know that Jesus will come back and sort that out for eternity.

2006-07-10 15:55:54 · answer #5 · answered by pianoman.jeremy 4 · 0 0

Dear Jack,

Your idea would be in violation of Revelation 22:18-19. You see "Christianity" was not invented to appeal to the masses. True christianity is not a club or group one joins to have people to associate with. A true christian is one who has been chosen by God (Jesus Christ) to live eternally with Him. These individuals are not god or angels. They are vile, filthy, wretched sinners whom the LORD (Jesus Christ) chose to be His "sheep" out of the mass of rebellious humanity. These sheep or elect could never enter because of their sins against God but the LORD in His great mercy and lovingkindness paid for their sins and gave them a new resurrected soul in which they love the LLORD and keep His commandments. Since ALL mankind is in rebellion to God and despise Him and His commandments, you can see what a transformation had to take place! Many of the "religious" people of the world think that Jesus paid for the sins of everyone on the cross and all you do is have to "accept" Him. That is absolutely not true! First, if Christ paid the sin debt for everyone then no one could go to hell! But the Bible tells us that most people will go to the lake of fire and only a remnant will be saved. Second, the suffering on the cross is not what paid for the elect's sins. Christ had to spend eternity under the wrath of God to pay for the sins of one sinner because that is the penalty. But how did Christ pay for the sins of these elect ones in the space of time of the cross? God had to compress His fierce wrath into the time of the crucifiction and pour it out on the Lord Jesus (this was the cup He drank of). When Jesus said, "It is finished" the whole penalty was paid in full. He rose again from the dead on Sunday morning to show that He had been victorious in paying the debt. This is why salvation is the most important thing to every person. If someone physically dies without being born again, the next thing they will know is standing before the Lord Jesus and He will condemn them to hell. If you want more info please see www.familyradio.com.
As for the Quran, it is not from God and therefore has no value. A muslim can be saved, but it will be from the reading or hearing of God's word-the Bible. Many people have been deceived into thinking that religion can save them... The Only One who can save them is the LORD Jesus Christ.

2006-07-10 11:50:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes maybe, but you forgot another , the Bagavad Gita! To create one ultimate religion you need to combine all of them, not only two.

2006-07-10 11:40:42 · answer #7 · answered by Paru 3 · 0 0

Much of the Koran is a rephrasing of the Old Testament or the Jewish Tanak. So, much of the two has already been combined.

2006-07-10 11:41:27 · answer #8 · answered by Buffy 5 · 0 0

Funny question. I still would like to know since the Muslims believe in Jesus and His birth; why does it say in the Koran He will come to judge the Earth if they claim His isn't the Son of God?

2006-07-10 11:24:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No. We should allow each individual to choose to worship in any way he/she sees fit so long as it does not harm others or force the tenets of personal faith on others.

I think all should subscribe to the Secular Bible.

2006-07-10 11:22:17 · answer #10 · answered by certifiedtarotmaster 4 · 0 0

Put that in the locker of nice but unlikely ideas, like Esperanto as a universal language.

2006-07-10 11:21:50 · answer #11 · answered by aboukir200 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers