Which of the following is more silly?

Question

A) A group of atheists who band together on yahoo answers to fight a "war on god"

B) A group of theists who answer these absurd questions on yahoo with "oh no! don't do that you'll go to hell"


I of course am in group A, and find it silly an absurd that people in group B took me seriously, but heh, they believe there actually is a man in the sky to go to war against so, to each his own.

May the non-God have mercy on your souls for not joining our cause against the God-God

Answer 1

c) the fact that both you, and your detractors, are wasting energy on something that has been debated for centuries between believers and non-believers.

or

d) the fact that I've just brought validity to your argument by responding to it. >_<

Answer 2

Each goup is equally silly but group A tends to be slightly more entertaining.

Group B can at least claim a reasonable motive, that is, the actual desire to save others from torment.

Group A's motivation, real or claimed, escapes me, unless it is some odd resentment about being relegated to a Hell they don't believe in.

Answer 3

Why is your war on God? Atheists that I know are all bitter, complain about everything, and believe nothing is their fault. It appears that they have tasted a glimpse of happiness, but have never known true JOY.
By the way, there is a difference between simple happiness & joy. Hopefully some of you come to know what that difference is. I'll keep praying for you.

Answer 4

Flatulations for being in Group A. Atheists are every bit as silly and self-righteous as religious people (actually even more so at times).

Answer 5

Psalms 14:1The senseless one has said in his heart:
“There is no Jehovah.”

Psalm 10:4 The wicked one according to his superciliousness makes no search; All his ideas are: “There is no God.”

Isaiah 29:16 The perversity of YOU men! Should the potter himself be accounted just like the clay? For should the thing made say respecting its maker: “He did not make me”? And does the very thing formed actually say respecting its former: “He showed no understanding”?


loj

Answer 6

Again the answers given are from the understanding of man. As we all have experienced in our own lives man is ever growing in intelligence, do we not? So why pose the question of God or not God when all that is spouted off is rhetoric of mankind's understanding and not of God's, thus propagating what you are saying. That until one (mankind), truly seeks out knowledge will man(kind) stay in ignorance.

Answer 7

I think you are a baby. If there was only you declaring war on people, you would get bored. But, when all these other insecure people say "Uh huh, you're right, these people are dumb",(while they nod their heads like puppies) then you feel powerful and like you are part of something. Just relax and let people believe what they want in peace.

Answer 8

D! The Flying Spaghetti Monster!

Very silly. But also brilliant.

Answer 9

I think both groups are silly, especially when each becomes rabid about convincing members of the other group that their own view is the only correct one. Sillyness rules.

Answer 10

hands down B most of these christians havent read the bible all the way to the end cuz there is a saying that says "judge not yet ye be judged" oh and this is for Charnele B learn to use spell check and shut the fu*k up!!

Answer 11

I don't think your commitment to the War On God is sincere enough General. I'll have court martialed!


Actually, I think the silliest part is them telling us we will win because they can't possibly lose. They apparently aren't familiar with the word hubris.