under what circumstances
2006-07-10 06:38:39 · 6 answers · asked by iluvhipos 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
No we have to stop policing the world we go out and try and help people and everyone hates us so **** them keep our troops home
2006-07-10 06:43:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe the Bush Administration is still weighing out the facts and haven't yet come to the same conclusion as the rest of the world's population. But then again would you care what people wanted as long as you made a quick buck?
2006-07-10 14:01:32 · answer #2 · answered by Swordfish 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Darfur Sudan is the worst case of ongoing slaughter of poor African blacks by Muslims. The GOP congress refuses to help the million slaughterd because there is NO oil in the region and because those killed are black.
2006-07-10 13:44:55 · answer #3 · answered by bereftcat 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if it is in the US. The US has no responsibility, right nor legal duty to interfere in the affairs of a sovereign nation.
2006-07-10 13:44:16 · answer #4 · answered by ceprn 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO. A civil war is for the nations citizens to fight.
2006-07-10 13:42:15 · answer #5 · answered by The Angry Stick Man 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no we should not. NATO should, and only for food supplies. a country should learn to take care of its own problems. hell honestly everyone in this world needs to get over themselves and understand that its ok to be different. let peace shine for once in our races history.
2006-07-10 13:44:17 · answer #6 · answered by da big red juggalo 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋