English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i know where it say men should not have sex with other men but i have not came across women should not have sex with other women and if the bible says what it means and means what it says and also nothing should be added or taken away from it why do people twist and turn the bible saying to mean what they want it to mean

2006-07-10 06:36:00 · 40 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

the bible is specific and nothing should be added to it or taken from it where are people getting ther interpertation of the bible from why do people interpret at all the bible says men and the bible says women and now im suppose to think they mean the same

2006-07-10 07:10:10 · update #1

40 answers

Don't know,Don't care.I hear that according to the Bible peolple have free will.I guess that only refers to certain subjects.

2006-07-24 07:31:38 · answer #1 · answered by 2BaD4u 4 · 0 1

Wonderful question. Back in the days of the Bible having been written you will notice that unless a female was talked about specifically that everything written pointed to the word man. Therefore the plural for man would be men. If you read your Bible at 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 it describes who will not inherit the Kingdom of God. Among this list it clearly states: Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men kept for unnatural purposes, nor men who lie with men. You obviously know that in the beginning Adam was created before Eve thereby putting men as the head; and also this is the language that may seem confusing to some. However, this does not apply just to men in the grammatical sense but to all human kind. Both men and women were commanded to abstain from the above mentioned behaviors if they wanted to achieve God's promises. Break down the scriptures one by one and you will see that it makes perfectly good sense when you put everything into logic. Hoped this helped you some.

2006-07-24 07:47:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Bible in my eyes isn´t something which shouldn´t be added or taken away a part of it for 2 reasons:

1) Depending on mainstreams of churches, popes and reformers during the centuries they added or took away books from the collection which they named "Bilble".

2) Also exist new revelations of prophets of our days which explain the Bible and also add information and substitute old information, particularly information from the Old Testament.

I read a modern interpretation of Bible, which was given by Jesus himself to Prophet JAKOB LORBER in Austria around 1850 and there is written, that sexual activities have the main purpose to create new homes for new souls. Following this idea sex between women or between men at momentary status of science can not create babies .... so it should not be done, even if it might be a lot of fun.

2006-07-24 09:05:50 · answer #3 · answered by consultant_rom 3 · 0 0

Oh come on now, it the Bible says that nothing should be added or taken away, as you yourself state, then why are you trying to manuever God's Word to fit you own gain. If that is the case, there are countless places in the Bible that refer to 'man', but it includes everyone on earth. Why would you think it would be forbidden by the men but okay for the wormen? The Word of God also says that in the ends day there will come a time when 'men' will not endure sound doctrine, but will turn away because of, for one, lust. Don't let the enemy deceive you. It appears to me that you are the one who is 'twisting and turning ' Gods' Word to fit what you want it to say.

2006-07-24 08:45:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Romans 1:21-28
1 Corinthians 6:9
1 Timothy 1:10

The term "homosexual" covers both male and female.

Personally, I dont believe it is wrong for anyone to love. Just as pork was at one time condemned in the Old Testament - things change with the times.

The people referred to as homosexuals in the bible were only concerned with the pleasure of the flesh, not of love, and the caring that I see in todays times between some homosexuals.

I refuse to believe a person will go to hell for loving another person when there are so many terrible things going on in this world that we should be more concerned with.

2006-07-10 06:48:48 · answer #5 · answered by Godslayer 2 · 0 0

It is there Romans1:26says if it is specifically that, you want it to mention women I believe that females are women and in verse 26tells us that females left their natural use of themselves one contrary to nature in that scripture it talks about both the females and the males leaving the natural for the unnatural, so that, there, is saying that homosexual unions be it males or females are all un natural and you are right in one thing, there, nothing should be added nor taken away from the scriptures, but, nothing should be ignored either! And when you speak of twisting things to suit themselves is that not, in reality, what homosexuals, be it males or females , are doing, twisting the natural to the un-natural to suit themselves? God created a Man and a Woman to procreate and to commit to each other and to bring ofspring onto the earth, if he wanted us to be homosexual why would he have made us male and female, why not have just one sex, two women can't have ofspring of their own, nor can two men! Why do you think Soddom and doesn't exist anymore have you read that part of the Bible.Should not God be the one to say what is natural or what is not?

2006-07-23 19:03:07 · answer #6 · answered by I speak Truth 6 · 1 0

Besides all the scriptures quoted in the other postings( which are correct) God has an order and a plan for mankind. To go against that plan, goes against God. He loves all of us, but man has perverted things into things they were not intended. These things are not of God. God created a man to be with a women, and also women to be with man.
The bible speaks of many different forms of love. Agape is a godly kind of love.One can love and it is not wrong, but our bodies are designed as such ( man with women) and even by our own design it is unnatural. The bible says these people will not enter Heaven. The bible says " rebellion is as of the spirit of witchcraft". that means when someone desides not to follow God's plan , but rather there own. That sin is as the same as witchcraft.

2006-07-24 08:51:45 · answer #7 · answered by Richard Kent 3 · 0 0

Just to add to what tigranvp2001 said, Leviticus 18;22,
Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womenkind, it is
abomination. This refers to men on men and women on women.
It is indeed interesting to note that same sex practice in included
in a very very small list of sins especially termed abomination.
If this is hard for you to accept, then perhaps you might do a
study in the Hebrew or Greek Septuagint texts. Sometimes
something gets lost in the translation.
I Corinthians 13;8a, Love never fails!!!!!

2006-07-24 09:39:29 · answer #8 · answered by ? 7 · 0 0

Romans 1:27, 28, the women changed their natural use and did that which is against nature. in like manner,men burned their lust toward one another, men with men, working that which is unnatural. Leviticus 18 is an outline for inappropriate sexual conduct. Sexual sin is the only sin that directly affects the body.(1 Corinthians 6:18-20)

2006-07-24 08:57:41 · answer #9 · answered by tigranvp2001 4 · 0 0

The bible was written by men...the church has been trying to do away with any female influence. Women didn't rate enough to talk about in more than the 'begets'.
It didn't mention it, because it wasn't imagined by any of the men that it would ever happen. Another point that the bible was written & conceived, & delivered by men, God would have known what we were capable of...

2006-07-24 07:49:59 · answer #10 · answered by fairly smart 7 · 0 0

I have not came across it in the Bible where it says that a women should'nt have sex with another women but in the Bible when god created Adam and Eve, man and woman he told them to be fruitful and multiply so if there was two women together they would'nt be able to multiply.

2006-07-24 06:16:50 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers