should those who follow a religion be allowed to be involved in the teaching of science in schools?

Answer 1

sure why not...

Answer 2

Yes. Because religion doesn't go against Science as far as I know from Islamic point of view. Instead I would say the Holy Quran challenges science in every way, I say that because it talks amount so many things in details that today even scientist are amazed about it.

http://askmuslims.com

Answer 3

Why not?, one of my science high school teacher wanted to become a priest and then changed his mind, he is a devoted catholic and he even told us he was going to teach that class in the correct way without telling us about religion.

Answer 4

As long as they teach SCIENCE and not religion as science there is no reason they shouldn't be allowed to.

Answer 5

Yes, those who follow a religion can teach science, just as well as anyone.
Please ignore the Anti-Christ. He's off on another evil rant.

Answer 6

Yes, so long as they are teaching science and not their religion. It's a science classroom not sunday school.

Answer 7

once back you're wondered. What a set, cult, or individual says does no longer change the which technique of the be conscious: Atheist, Atheism, and so on. Atheism is lack of concept in a god or gods. i presumed I already made this sparkling to you. it truly is like putting forward hitler became a christian. purely because he stated he became doesn't make him one. He did not persist with any of the teachings yet the church may praise his birthday each and every 365 days. once back.. Atheism is lack of concept in any god. Is that sparkling now? attempt back creationist.

Answer 8

Yes. Science has not yet proven the non-existence of God. Accordingly, God can still be part of the science curriculum - although many scientists would argue a very, very remote possibility.

Answer 9

Declared on the day of salvation, on the first day of the Year One
(—on September 30, 1888 of the false time-chronology)

War to the death against depravity: depravity is Christianity

First proposition.— Every type of anti-nature is depraved. The most depraved type of man is the priest: He teaches anti-nature. Against the priest one doesn't use arguments, one uses the penitentiary.

Second proposition.— Every participation in divine service is an assassination attempt on public morality. One should be more severe toward Protestants than toward Catholics, more severe toward liberal Protestants than toward the orthodox. The criminal character of a Christian increases when he approaches knowledge [Wissenschaft]. The criminal of criminals is consequently the philosopher.

Third proposition.— The accursed places, in which Christianity has hatched its basilisk eggs, should be razed to the ground and be, as vile places of the earth, the terror of all posterity. One should breed poisonous snakes there.

Fourth proposition.— The sermon on chastity is a public instigation to anti-nature. Every display of contempt for sexual love, and every defilement of it through the concept "dirty" ["unrein"] is original sin against the holy spirit of life.

Fifth proposition.— With a priest at one's table food is pushed aside: one excommunicates oneself therewith from honest society. The priest is our chandala—he should be ostracized, starved, and driven into every kind of desert.

Sixth proposition.— One should call the "holy" story by the name that it deserves, as the accursed story; one should use the words "God," "Saviour," "redeemer," "saint" as invectives, as criminal badges.

Seventh proposition.— The rest follows therefrom.

The Antichrist

Answer 10

So long as they keep their religious beliefs separate when they are teaching

Answer 11

yes. I think our children should be taught both sides creation vs. evolution. So that they can make their own choices after being throughly educated.