English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The Holy Martyrs see civilians as a legitimate target because in the West they vote, have financial power and are a part of the pornographic whore's nest. If they kill only soldiers that are paid to risk their lives, where is the terror in that? I myself do not approve of this, but I know that they believe civilian casualties applied in a random way serves a great purpose to the jihad warriors.

2006-07-09 23:31:56 · 14 answers · asked by Islamic Warrior for Allah 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

14 answers

Is that not a massive over generalization? Not all in the West follow pornographic ways or have financial power. Also, not everyone is behind the war in Iraq. What you said is disturbing. Terror only causes people to hate the terrorists more and pushes them to resit you further. The only changes brought about are negative. And in my view, anyone who knows he is killing innocent civilians is not holy. That person is a disgrace who has no compassion for the lives of those he or she kills and their families. It is a very selfish, cowardly, and disturbing act.

2006-07-09 23:34:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes, I can say this for certain.

It's the same logic that drives the governments of the West to launch a war not on any specific, defeatable group, but on "terror" itself, a concept that can be used to label any enemy.

If jihad warriors kill civilians, they move ever further from winning the argument, from converting liberal minds to the cause of Islam, or from peaceful co-existence. Targeting non-combatants merely turns the whole of Western civilisation, and a good part of Islamic civilisation too, against the martyrs and their cause. The action stops the ears of those who would listen, and means that only total war, only the total extermination of everyone who disagrees with jihad can result in anything that looks like victory - and even then, the victory would be hollow and empty as a long-dead martyr's skull. Similarly, the West, by warring on "terror" allows itself the right to turn all those who disagree with it into enemies, and the terror can only be extinguished by the silence of mass extermination.

Killing non-combatants, on either side, simply means there will be an endless stream of children growing up in hatred, determined to avenge, determined to destroy, and slowly the arguments wither, till all that is left is civilians backing their government's attempts to wipe its opponents off the face of the earth.

What god, what martyr, what politician, soldier, child, will inherit that Earth? And what curses will they throw upon our generation, that made this war?

2006-07-10 06:53:25 · answer #2 · answered by mdfalco71 6 · 0 0

Why can't people live their lives without mass-killing each other off? As a war strategy it is highly effective, but what happens when you turn on the civilian population and then they in turn, turn on you? You may call them traitors of the religion but what they are trying to do is simply to survive, to be able to live their lives in peace. And they will eventually make that choice. If they choose to all rise up against you all at the same time, how can terrorism terrorise people who no longer have anything to lose? They would be on the same terms as you, and what do you have to offer them that they will want? Nothing.

Extremism serves only to isolate those who perpetuate it. Eventually, any religion who believes in such an issue will be condemned and degraded in international opinion beyond repair.

The ironic thing is that these extremists are trying to prove that their cause is just. How can you do just that when you're randomly killing off people of the international community?

2006-07-10 06:40:40 · answer #3 · answered by optimistic_pessimist1985 4 · 0 0

Please remove your masquerade. You are using a false-id (muslim_extremist). It may better be named xxx-extremist. Why malign others faith in the disguise of being believed you as a Muslim? Nice try!!

Some of your questions are biased against Islam, which are as follows:

1. Can you say for certain mass killing of civilians by jihad martyrs is a bad thing?
Asked by muslim_extremist - 9 answers - Religion & Spirituality - 12 minutes ago - Open

2. Do you think that the goofiness of Iranian President Abiminajeh prevents him from being Islamic sex symbol?
Asked by muslim_extremist - 6 answers - Current Events - 1 day ago- Resolved

3. May I declare a fatwa against Yahoo!Answers because they remove perfectly legitimate questions...?
Asked by muslim_extremist - 12 answers - Yahoo! Answers - 1 day ago- Resolved

4. Can you believe that I go above what is required by Allah and pray not 5 times but 9 times daily?
Asked by muslim_extremist - 18 answers - Religion & Spirituality - 2 days ago - In Voting

2006-07-10 06:55:11 · answer #4 · answered by Hafiz 7 · 0 0

To tell you the truth, there is an ambiguity in you statement....
I am not sure if it is on purpose or .....

Who told you that " the Holy Martyrs see civilians as legitimate target..." give me one official, non official or religious saying of that sort. ???
Can you name one school which was targeted by those " Holy Martyrs" ??? just for instance....
I can give you several schools which were bombed by Israeli forces in Palestine or by the USA( or their militia) army in Iraq.
If civilians are targeted for any reason and by any force, that is a crime and that is terrorism.

2006-07-10 08:16:52 · answer #5 · answered by Abdulhaq 4 · 0 0

the true jihad is not to kill the innocent civilians but to target the military troops.......killing innocent civilians is against the teachings of the Holy Quran and Muhammad(pbuh) sunnah"s.
e.g.
if al-zarqawi was not killing the innocent iraqi civilians then i would not consider him as a terrorist but as a legitimate freedom fighter if he was targeting only the military troops that invaded their country............al-qaeda jihad is based on absolutely wrong ideas because they say kill and hate all the non-muslims and that's obvious from their activities.
when we talk about what's happening in israel there's a little bit of confusion about saying whether the palestini's mujahiddins targeting the israili civilians are terrorists or not because israeli troops are doing things much more horrible than that ...they vanish complete palestini camps with innocent palestinians like what they are doing lately in ghaza........also this whole country is rightfully owned by the palestinians but the jews invaded it in 1948 with the help of u.k.
hope my words helped you atleast a little bit.....
Peace and Regards..

2006-07-10 07:00:20 · answer #6 · answered by Ahmed Jadalla Bushra Badawi 4 · 0 0

The only martyrs I have seen in the war are the civilian killed by both sides. No one that ties a bomb to themselves is a martyr. Martyrs are killed by others that hate them for their beliefs. They don't resist and they don't fight back. Stephen was a good example of a martyr. Blessing those that stoned him asking God not to hold the evil they were doing against them. Not once did he bend over pick up a rock and throw it back..

2006-07-10 06:40:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Did you know that your Allah is also known by many other names eg. God, Pambuch, Job etc; because they are ALL one and the same. Did you also know that the Koran, the Bible and the Tora are also one and the same...albeit translated differently...as in other languages to suit the citizens of any particular country..hence disparities. It is Religious leaders (who claim authority to act as mouth.pieces) who set the political..and I MEAN political agenda. Killing another is a mortal sin in any religion. Allah gave us a set of Social Rules by which to treat oneanother, messages came from the heart, Not from a weapon. It is the Religious leaders(including eg the Pope) who determines/nominates Martyrs not God/Allah. "PEACE AND GOODWILL TO ALL" "PEACE BE WITH YOU" hatred does'nt bear a mention except by those who use it for their gain. Religion and Spirituality are not one and the same. The first is deliberate and comes from the head. The second is delivered from a pure heart.

2006-07-10 07:03:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No one can say anything for certain. But killing of civillians is bad in any case whether by jihad matyrs or western soldiers.

2006-07-10 06:37:06 · answer #9 · answered by Kaela 4 · 0 0

Extremists are come inside this room and destrying the peace of the room, they have throw out from the world.

2006-07-10 06:38:44 · answer #10 · answered by Raja 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers