First, there is not a single former slave alive today. If there were they would certainly be due just compensation for their labor, but the ancestors of atrocities do not deserve compensation in any way. As a precedent for this point of view, from the last century, let us look at how the compensation of slave labor during the holocaust of World War II has been handled. The thousands of people that survived that inequity are being compensated by both the government of Germany and by the companies that gained from their forced labor, and rightfully so. But their children have no inherited right to collect for the uncompensated labor of their parents. Certainly the grandchildren and great grandchildren of American slaves never experienced the appalling life of slavery, and therefore, like the children of Jews and others enslaved in Germany 50 years ago, they have no claim for themselves.
Secondly, blacks do not have a monopoly on living in poverty in this country. According to the latest census data approximately 30 percent of blacks and whites live in poverty. Hispanics unfortunately have an even higher percentage living below the poverty line. All this current day poverty can not be attributed to a disgusting institution that was ended 150 years ago. It can however be attributed to present day governmental policy. There should be a monumental effort made by the government, at all levels, to get all Americans out of poverty, but a policy centered on only one race is just as wrong as slavery was.
Thirdly, slavery could not have existed without the complicity of black Africans who supplied most of the unfortunate humans that were sold into this dreadful condition. It was not just whites that kept this retched institution going for over 200 years. In addition, there were over 200,000 white Americans that paid the ultimate retribution during the Civil War, when they gave their lives to end slavery. The reparation debt owed to slaves was paid a long time ago when the North won the Civil War and freed them.
2006-07-11 16:41:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Carl 7
·
5⤊
0⤋
The idea of Reparations is pure bullclinton. Why should I pay good money to people today for the injustices of 150 years ago? Who today is affected? Reparations is just a way to separate money from the wealthy and have it given to the unwealthy by force of law. It will never happen. No US Congressman is ever going to vote to take multiple billions of dollars from you and give it to American Blacks who were not alive in 1863. To do so would be the end of their political careers.
2006-07-09 22:35:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by christopher s 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree with you bro', I think that reparations should be in the form of health care, but in education more than anything...I say this because we need more African Americans in high places, there's so many brilliant African Americans in the ghetto, but because of the necessity to survive, they usually quit school to provide for their families, only a select few of African Americans, from the ghetto, go on to college, and most times it's because of some type of support system, it don't matter where this support system comes from, but just as long as it's there. I know I went kind of off topic, but you see my point.
Great question!
2006-07-10 05:25:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are no living slaves or slave holders. Many white people died to make that so. My great grandfather, a union soldier, was wounded in the civil war. Does that mean I should I receive reparations? Of course not, nor should anyone.
2006-07-10 00:26:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by rhymingron 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
yeah i pretty much agree with what you said. reparations are just going to bring down the credibility of successful black people.
plus i just think it is BS. it happened 150 years ago and nobody alive then is alive today. plus my family has been here less than 100 years, and they were discriminated against too when they came here. why should my tax dollars go to paying reparations?
2006-07-10 01:40:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think anybody who owned slaves should pay their slaves reparations.
Fact 1: Slavery ended 140 years ago
Fact 2: There are no living ex-slaves
Fact 3: There are no living ex-slave owners.
Give it a rest. I'm not paying anybody anything for something I had nothing to do with.
2006-07-10 02:58:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Report Abuse 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The political motivation for it truly is person-pleasant; there's a wide push contained in the black caucus to evangelise the concept equipment of inherited guilt it truly is a theory as previous as unique sin. Reparations advocates declare that if I inherited to blame wealth I inherited a minimum of many of the guilt, because I derived the convenience of the wealth. that ought to represent that if inherited wealth got here from slavery, the inheritors of it may well be inheriting guilt. it is because they're too egocentric to renowned the position the line of inherited guilt or unique sin takes us. It takes us decrease back thousands of years of progression. decrease back previous female's suffrage to a time even as female became considered inferior for Eve's sin. decrease back to a time when we were all held to blame for the status of our fathers. in the course of the Classical era if a father commited homicide then died, the son should be finished. is this quite the position we commit to bypass? yet another cog of their concept of guilt is that no longer all whites are decendants of slave vendors. ought to someone struggle through for no different reality than their race? that is taking us decrease back previous the civil rights flow. This vicious cycle ought to bypass round and round doing no longer some thing yet damage. you could still also say that whites can't pay reparations to the descendents of slaves till we've accrued reparations from the English, for forcing our ancestors to go away the British Isles and make new homes in an untamed desert. besides, Any perceived debt owed to the descendants of slaves is better than offset by technique of the price incurred upon the north in words of lives lost contained in the Civil warfare, the warfare attempt and the price of rebuilding the south. Compound that with many years of social welfare and Medicaid funds, the U. S. (northern states a minimum of) should be owed a wide debt by technique of blacks lower than inherited guilt. it is particularly ordinary. they pick to play the sufferer for the only purpose of having some thing for no longer some thing. they pick reparations contained in the kind of money, tax breaks, status, and so on. because they're offended and the persons fanning the anger are none except Sharpton and his cronies. by technique of telling blacks that they are being held down they're disimpowering their personal human beings. If I allow you to understand many times that somebody else controls your destiny, how a lot personal skill are you going to personal? No American black today became owned as a slave and no American black today is owed a unmarried ingredient for it.
2016-11-30 23:41:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Since reparations can't be made to those who lived under slavery since they're not alive, reparations can't be distributed fairly and shouldn't be at all.
2006-07-10 12:41:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by LEI 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
How about all the children, not only "black" children- or the abused children, children that are actually in need (and not just by the color of their skin). But overall I do agree with what you are saying.
2006-07-10 05:24:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
.Reparations would be for them being in this country against their will .They should not get repaid and also be allowed to stay can,t have it both ways if they get reparations then they should be deported and never allowed back
2006-07-09 22:32:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋