English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-09 21:12:19 · 7 answers · asked by /\ 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

7 answers

The bible is a book of mythology, so whichever one you like is just as good as any other.


There are no "irrefutable facts" about the bible other than it was invented by the Catholic church aka Roman Empire.

2006-07-09 21:14:55 · answer #1 · answered by Left the building 7 · 0 0

they're all accurate - they each take a slightly different overview of what happened - which is all the same - but some emphasize the spiritual more than the physical, etc. for example, Matthew begins with geneaolgy, Mark starts with Yeshua's mission, Luke was a doctor and began with how physically the Master came to be, John focuses on the Word, and the Word incarnated.
Each one tells the same story but from a particular aspect to give us a better overview of what happened.
and do not listen to other answers saying the gospels were written hundreds of years later - they were not - they were written in the apostles lifetimes, and that is an irrefutable historical and archeological fact

2006-07-10 04:27:39 · answer #2 · answered by Kevin A 4 · 0 0

There isn't a most accurate gospel..They were written 400 years after the death of Jesus. And lavished on to fit that days needs. The human factor.So what do you think?

2006-07-10 04:21:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

there no accurate gospel, it's the point of view and belief of the person who said it or wrote it at the time,......the real question would be, if there were 12 apostles, why are there only 4 gospels in the bible?

probably cause they contradicted the political and social views of the church at the time that the stories were complied and put together as the bible that we know of today.

2006-07-10 04:48:34 · answer #4 · answered by bart simpson 2 · 0 0

Praying to the Lord to speak through you..........I have such a hard time sharing my faith, I feel nothing I do is accurate but rest assured if you just get them thinking the Lord is doing his work through you..........no matter how long it might take. And the best one I like is by saying you can only go to Heaven if you have been "born again" and you reply with what convinced me that I wasn't born again was the ten commandments......and how many I had broken.......and then you go on to read them and question them and tell them if they have told even one lie they are a liar and cannot enter the Kingdom of God...........but if they repent and Jesus Christ's name today they can be saved and get a second chance.

2006-07-10 04:18:55 · answer #5 · answered by Lesley C 2 · 0 0

I don't think it's a matter of accuracy as much as it is a matter of detail. While Matthew and Luke go into great detail about the birth of Jesus, for example, Mark barely mentions it. Different human writers give us different perspectives on the life of Christ. These four combined are what give the complete picture of His sinless life.

2006-07-10 04:33:33 · answer #6 · answered by df1ngtfbs 2 · 0 0

the one you are reading at the time

2006-07-10 04:14:41 · answer #7 · answered by Gamla Joe 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers