2006-07-09 13:07:09 · 17 answers · asked by superdave 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
michael s - Isaiah 1:18 "Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD"
Acts 18:4 "And he reasoned in the synagogue every sabbath, and persuaded the Jews and the Greeks."
2006-07-09 15:03:16 · update #1
Jude 1:3 You should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.
2006-07-09 15:06:34 · update #2
You cannot do these things without talking.
2006-07-09 15:07:56 · update #3
GOD
2006-07-09 13:10:03 · answer #1 · answered by christine 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Atheism isn't a philosophy, and it includes no idea And so the argument would must have a subject in which both facet would have opinionated responses from whoever the judges were a million. What has proved to be the way in which to regulate people? faith 2. What components the most sensible representation of the international? Atheism 3. what's volatile? faith 4. Who will not in any respect concede? Atheists have not something to concede lol
2016-10-14 07:10:01 · answer #2 · answered by Erika 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i assume you are saying the debate topic would be christianity v. atheism and not whether or not kids should wear school uniforms or something like that. if so, that would depend on the judge. an atheist judge would pick the atheist and a christian judge would pick the christian because there honestly is no way to win that debate. neither have any real concrete proof that god does or does not exist. one relies on faith, one on their own interpretation. how can you debate that?
2006-07-09 13:11:57 · answer #3 · answered by gumby 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Smartest" is such a relative term. It depends on what you consider "smart". But the atheist will probably rely only on his IQ and what he or she has learned from books and schooling. The Christian may also have that, but also has the wisdom and guidance from God, so I would say the Christian would win.
2006-07-09 13:16:23 · answer #4 · answered by cj_justme 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think smartness might not be the winning decision in this debate. because atheists don't believe in God and so they dont' have that extra thing that christian believe in with a firm belief. if they're both the smartest, the christian has the edge from experience and...God on his/her side!
2006-07-09 13:15:54 · answer #5 · answered by batmanxgirl 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The smartest, no matter what they are discussing. Besides, nobody wins a debate, they just bring up valid points for their argument and the people decide for themselves what they believe.
2006-07-09 13:15:35 · answer #6 · answered by Mark W 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, if he were the ‘smartest’ Christian he wouldn’t be debating, now would he? Debates solve nothing, arguing proves nothing, and a wise man avoids them both. We are called to be light and salt to the world, not debaters and rhetoricians.
2006-07-09 14:10:37 · answer #7 · answered by michael s 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither would win, because neither one would be able to scientifically prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that their argument is the correct one. Both arguments are based entirely on opinion and belief.
2006-07-09 13:11:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely the Christian if you are debating atheism & Christianity, there is nothing to know about atheism, puts the atheist in a pickle.
2006-07-09 13:22:42 · answer #9 · answered by Mr.Wise 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would if I was the smartest Christian because I don't believe in Atheists.
2006-07-09 13:22:02 · answer #10 · answered by bowhunk7627 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nothing to do with smartness... but think about it: this argument could never be solved, because both sides have their facts and interpretations. But, none of us were there. We don't know. So, it comes down to who you believe and how much faith you have in your beliefs. You just can't argue faith. You have it or you don't...
2006-07-09 13:28:33 · answer #11 · answered by Aaron S 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋