English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

That's a quote from the movie Air Force One, (with Harrison Ford) but i thought it originally came from someone else. Any ideas?

2006-07-09 13:01:24 · 7 answers · asked by cate 1 in Education & Reference Quotations

7 answers

A lot of answers say Martin Luther King, but they are only part right. King said it, indeed, and he was one of the most ardent proponents of peace with justicte in our time. King was also a theologian, however, and he read many of the great theologians from history. In this case, his source is undoubtedly St. Augustine (Bishop of Hippo, 354-430 AD). Augustine often associates peace with justice, and he explicitly says: "The kind of peace that is based on injustice... does not deserve the name of Peace"

2006-07-09 21:16:17 · answer #1 · answered by artful dodger 3 · 1 0

Originally spoken by Martin Luther King, Jr. on several occasions.

2006-07-09 13:12:36 · answer #2 · answered by theyuks 4 · 0 0

Martin Luther King said it.

It's from "Letter From a Birmingham Jail"

2006-07-09 13:05:30 · answer #3 · answered by ratboy 7 · 0 0

Sigmund Freud

2006-07-09 13:05:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i became gazing a question/answer consultation with Jurgen Habermas on Youtube the day in the previous in the present day and a student requested him about Derrida's grievance of Kant's use of the interest peace. He suggested Kant positioned primacy on the state of peace being purely a lack of conflict. Habermas's answer became that Kant became employing the criminal time period for peace, it extremely is the shortcoming of conflict. It appeared as although Habermas did not sense the question necessary to be requested, yet this question earrings for me because the student's question did for me the day in the previous in the present day. that is in ordinary words semantics, yet even as it is composed of information epistemologies we sort of want to understand the definitions of the words we are employing. It will change into even extra crucial when we are discussing global monetary/political kinfolk, and different circumstances the position we are employing our theories to truth. In my prognosis of the time period peace, it ought to bypass previous signifying situations without conflict, yet ought to also, as Rand ought to say, characterize a society whose authorities's sole function became to guard its electorate from the initiation of coercion, and that must be the initiation of coercion on someone (their body) or their personal resources both overseas and loved ones. In my study it extremely is the authentic definition of justice, and certain, in my opinion i trust that peace isn't basically the absence of stress, that's the presence of justice. obviously, lets probably be arguing about an imaginary entity, such as human beings's arguments about god, as we ought to ought to disclaim all empirical information of potential's propensity to centralize and enhance its administration and information that exhibits human beings favor to be managed. As Robert Ardrey suggested contained in the Social settlement, even as we deny truth and idealize the imaginary we make no longer achievable the realizable.

2016-11-06 02:58:15 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Superman and the League of Justice.

2006-07-09 13:04:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think it was actually Ghandi

2006-07-09 13:05:18 · answer #7 · answered by squirellywrath 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers