theyve both been disproved, and reports have shown to have been falsified. seeing how many have read these reports or relied on the news media proporting them in hyperbole
2006-07-09 11:52:55 · 7 answers · asked by Mr Spock 4 in Environment
Global warming has definitely been more thoroughly disproved.
Sure "Global" overpopulation is a flasehood, but noone would deny that overpopulation doesn't happen on the local scale in some places.
2006-07-09 12:18:44 · answer #1 · answered by Paul C 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I heard the Mayflower landing at Plymouth Rock was an unsubstantiated rumor ...thank heavens for junk science or some doctors would have nothing to talk about ...
2006-07-09 18:59:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Peak Oil" will soon overtake Global Warming, in my view.
The best part is that the two wacko theories conflict with one another - if "Peak Oil" theory is true, we have nothing to worry about regarding Global Warming!
2006-07-09 19:22:47 · answer #3 · answered by Mammatus 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both are over reported with sensationalism.
2006-07-09 19:04:25 · answer #4 · answered by Irish 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is your agenda isn't it.How many questions will you ask about this subject?You are bordering on the compulsive.
2006-07-09 18:57:06 · answer #5 · answered by David S 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
over pop
2006-07-09 18:57:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither.
2006-07-09 19:28:52 · answer #7 · answered by Engineer 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋