English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

"I'm proud of him for doing it and I thanked him for doing it," he said of Bush during a "Cafe con Clinton" breakfast speech to the annual conference of the National Council of La Raza, the nation's largest Latino civil rights advocacy group.

http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctimes/news/state/15000190.htm?source=rss&channel=cctimes_state

They made no mention of them at all?

2006-07-09 09:28:56 · 13 answers · asked by yars232c 6 in Politics & Government Immigration

13 answers

Again, we can thank the liberal media for censoring what we ignorant, need-to-be-herded, American's hear. As citizens, we need to refuse to be treated like sheep by those who support any organization that encourage lawbreakers....and the immigration laws need to be enforced, not ignored....

Thank You for bringing this out....I will cut and paste and send it to everyone on my mailing list!

2006-07-09 11:02:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The next two pages are El Plan de Aztlan. It starts off 'be warned Gringos' and goes into how the La Raza de Bronze will drive out the exploiters and declares independence of their mestizo nation. Under their economy goals is 'Land and realty ownership will be acquired by the community for the people's welfare.'

This movement is without a doubt racist and communist. Is this the same La Raza that Bill Clinton & Karl Rove spoke at?"

You can view the documents here: http://alamoalliance.org/ao.html

These documents outline a clear plan for “Reconquista”, or the reconquering of a vast section of the southwest portion of the United States, by populating this area with hispanic immigrants, legal and illegal, with the intention of creating an independent nation, apart from the United States.

You’d better wake up America, this plan is REAL and is being implemented as we speak.

2006-07-09 12:03:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No; we ought to consistently by no ability fall to there low point and proceed to help the integrity of journalism. the wonderful factor it is user-friendly to do is make human beings responsive to how warped a view the are transforming into from this station. Boycott them, actual letters, yet do not loose integrity. Fox is the only station that does this because of the fact an extremely wealthy, souless republican owns this station and pushes a republican schedule. not lots could be accomplished because of the fact; think of if the government did intrude exceptionally decrease than a democratic president. we'd be blamed for censorship because of the fact Republicans like to scream foul even while they are the actual criminals. Absolutly no scruples those human beings. Bravo, for noticing; evaluate your self smarter than the common American. regrettably, not as lots a supplement wisely, is going actual over many heads. there's a documentary with regard to the scandal you ought to examine it out.

2016-12-08 17:40:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I saw that story, I forget what broadcast, but they actually showed Cliton praising Bush. My immediate thought was Oh No, when Clinton says something is good, it can't be good for law abiding citizens. But then that depends on what your defination of good is. I'm just curious though, If a group of white people got together and started a group called, lets say, The National Association for the Advancement of White People (NAAWP), or La White, would it be labeled as a hate group, simply because it would made up of white people?

2006-07-09 12:50:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

because Clinton looks out for his people he may have been born a white man but that boy is a Blactino all the way

Blactino = Black and Latin person :) lol

plus why would the news want to show all the good clinton is doing now that he is not president that would only undermine the so called good that Bush is doing and then it will be proven that even thoiugh he had sex in the oval office we were better off with him then bush

2006-07-09 09:33:51 · answer #5 · answered by OZoNE 4 · 0 0

Do you mean when bush went to the doughnut shop to praise legal mexican immigrants.

Clinton was pissed that Bush got to the doughnut's before him!

I do not know why Bush was praising them for doing what is expected of them.

Hey if Clinton would have took care of OBL instead of just firing a few missiles to distract away from his impeachment trial, We would not be at war now.

2006-07-09 09:36:13 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

After the first hour of coverage of the protests in Mexico over Obrador's loss they edited out the part about the US Embassy telling Americans to stay away from the protests and reminding them that legal residents or not, it was against the law for them to take part in any political action, including demonstrations.

I wonder why they took that out, too?

2006-07-09 10:39:07 · answer #7 · answered by DAR 7 · 0 0

How interesting questions and answers.

Don't get me started on Mr. Greed Clinton

2006-07-09 12:33:14 · answer #8 · answered by *** The Earth has Hadenough*** 7 · 0 0

It all comes down to what news you watch as to whether or not you are going to coverage of 'relevant' portions of a story.

2006-07-10 07:52:32 · answer #9 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0 0

go Bill Clinton

2006-07-09 09:31:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers