The early Christian gospels are not historical biographies of Jesus. They were written in a way that appeals to historical truth, but are not history in any actual sense. The Gospels were written between 40 to 200 years after the fact, and drastically altered during the “Council of Nicea.”
In Islam, there is no actual copy of the Koran. The earliest written record of the Koran was mentioned in a biography of Mohammed by Ibn Ishaq who wrote about 100 years after the death of the Prophet.
Hinduism does not have any one founder, or any single doctrine.
Buddhism is a religion that would be much closer in spirit to the views of an agnostic or atheist.
Where did the book of Mormon come from? Joseph Smith said he translated it from old manuscripts, but all we have are HIS papers.
The only “Religion” documented is “Scientology.” We have all the original bullshit and still some people can’t believe it’s a vast con game!
From the book "The plain truth about God-101" www.god-101.com
2006-07-09
09:02:55
·
13 answers
·
asked by
Moses
2
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
Whatever religion you start Moses. Finally someone who shares the same views as I. How can we trust the reinterpreted translations of reinterpreted translations of reinterpretation translations that are thousand of years old as authentic when the originals are nowhere to be found? But we continue to believe the priests and pastors and godly men as being selected by God to do his work when in actually it was a career decision they made. I'm still looking for the Word of God. But the only word I have found is the word of Man claiming to be the word of God. Claiming something is so does not make it so.
2006-07-09 09:10:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Fixarooni 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
Scientology - L.R. Hubbard wrote Dianetics after saying in interview that people were such sheep he could make up a religion that would outlast him with thousonds of followers. So yes we have a complete documented history and it means nothing.
Buddhism - Meets your qualifications precisely because it doesn't try to prove the existance of a god. In Buddhism there are only truths and this is why it is a godless religion.
2006-07-09 09:09:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by tenaciousd 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, there was an actual copy of the Koran found during the Usman ibn Affan caliphate. Usman was a "sahaba" of the prophet. Compared to the current Koran, THERE WAS NO CHANGE.
2006-07-09 09:07:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by haterhater 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Baha'i Faith. We still have documents in Baha'u'llah's handwriting, we have histories written from all periods during the last 150 years or so of its existence.
2006-07-09 19:39:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by world_gypsy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
ISLAAM ISLaAM is the fastest turning out to be faith interior the international. because Islam is an complete way of existence. It tells guy about the point of his introduction and existence, his best destiny, his position between different creatures and extra importantly, it components him with practise to steer a balanced and useful existence which will enable him to stay away from the Hell-fireplace and be rewarded with an section in Paradise interior the existence after lack of existence. in simple terms Islaam is to "Obey Allah" (Allah is the call of the purely one authentic God). Islaam is a verb in Arabic (a doing note). the fellow who does Islaam is termed a Muslim. (Allah calls us "Muslims" in His Speech of Qur'ân).
2016-10-14 07:00:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by pantle 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only a religion that has been started in the last two years. Any longer than that, and they start making up ridiculous lies.
2006-07-09 09:06:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, there are three original Qurans in existence today; one in Cairo, one in Turkey, and the other I can't quite remember where.
Somebody didn't do his research! Tsk tsk tsk.
2006-07-09 09:15:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by hayaa_bi_taqwa 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Far Out Man,
You did all the home work for us
It all just comes down to Faith?
What do you beleive?
~Sweety
2006-07-09 09:07:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sundra 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
no. if it could be proven 100% it wouldnt be a religion because religion requires faith. and people should try to force or push or brainwash people into a religion and as far as i can tell all mainstream religions are violent.
2006-07-09 09:05:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by medwardl 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yep
2006-07-09 09:06:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋