English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

5 answers

It all depends on the types of bones. Skull bones are FAR more valuable than say a femur or carpal bones.
And NO anthropologist or paleontologist would draw a conclusion without adequate proof. (the mistakes of the past notwithstanding, we DO learn from the mistakes of past scientists after all, unlike the religious community...)

2006-07-09 03:31:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

17

2006-07-10 11:58:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Not many. If you don't have enough, just put some in from somewhere else and call it what you want, no matter what the others may be from, cat, dog, ape, whatever.

2006-07-09 10:56:20 · answer #3 · answered by ramall1to 5 · 0 0

I think one for an evolutionist :-). Personally, I need more than a kneebone and half a jaw.

http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/fossils.asp

2006-07-09 10:39:49 · answer #4 · answered by bobm709 4 · 0 0

Yeah ...isn't erosion a bummer ...you guys might even have an arc if it weren't for erosion ...luckily we have science to sort and make some sense of it ...

2006-07-09 10:32:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers