No, Ozone near the surface of the earth is harmful to living beings. It is beneficial only high up in the stratosphere. Ozone is extremely reactive and will have no time to reach up there.
2006-07-08 19:47:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by ag_iitkgp 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Actually the Ozone hole over the Antarctic is decreasing now as I read about it recently in a scientific journal, however I believe strongly that we have had little impact upon the ozone regarding anything which we have done, or not.
We are capable of observing the changes, although a very large factor to Ozone depletion is with respect to sulfuric gases which are vented naturally from volcano's.
Also methane gas which is exhausted into our atmosphere naturally with respect to farms, cattle yards, and other natural sources, depletes the Ozone.
Mother nature takes care of herself always, and even with respect to air pollutions the rain traps dirt, and debris and sends it back to the earth where it is absorbed into our soil thus cleaning the air that we breeth
2006-07-08 20:09:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Thoughtfull 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
2 different types of ozone, good ozone and bad ozone, bad ozone is near the earths surface and will never go and fill that hole, it'll just make us feel like crap, the good ozone that used to be where the hole is now was destroyed by PFC's which stands for something unpronouncable and indeed unspellable, but no, the ozone in the ozone layer and the ozone in smog are two different things, the ozone in the ozone layer blocks uv radiation, the ozone in smog makes us feel like ****.
And btw Martin, who mentioned global warming? I heard not a PEEP about global warming and the ozone layer has a remarkably small amount to do with global warming.
2006-07-08 19:48:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Archangel 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Holes contained in the ozone layer is of a bygone era of environmental activism. The scare it generated (going on way in the previous the global Warming debate), became that human wellness became in possibility from the sunlight's radiation that ought to bypass unfiltered by potential of the ambience if the ozone layer degraded adequate. what became to blame for this degradation were refrigerants and propellants utilized in countless business and client purposes. easily that is an celebration of a effective campaign the position scientists determined that human beings were generating a doubtlessly volatile substance and freeing it into the ambience, and guidelines to direct company practices were carried out for this reason. consequently we solved that problem for the most section by employing arising change refrigerants and technologies that allowed the ambience to "heal itself" swifter than guy ought to harm it. that's way distinct and fairly unrelated to global warming because those ozone detrimental chemical compounds easily make contributions to COOLING of the ambience. The ozone layer is amorphous like the ambience itself so disturbances like rockets and actual products haven't any lasting result, they purely bypass it round variety of like dropping a penny into an aquarium. yet CO2 and different greenhouse toxins from non-aspect resources, that we are attempting to chop back, make contributions to ozone layer regeneration.
2016-11-06 02:09:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think ozone depletion is an issue any more. It's the greenhouse gasses like CO and Methane that are causing global warming.
2006-07-08 19:47:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by martin h 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Do cars release ozone?
2006-07-08 20:50:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Scozbo 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
martin h is right - ozone is fixing its self - the hole is getting smaller - didn't you get the memo? the buzz phrase for the new millennium is "Global Warming" (lets hope that doesn't screw things up and fix its self too)
2006-07-08 20:02:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Getch 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
ozone repairs itself.....and as we heard the hole near antartica is decreasing....
2006-07-08 20:24:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by archana r 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
duh, we are basically scrwed cuz is any one gonna listen besides the hippies!
2006-07-09 13:36:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by Richmond V 1
·
0⤊
0⤋