Well, I ask you please take the time to read this link to get some perspective, its a bit shocking what our govt, mexico and canada are planning for our future, read it and weep...
http://rense.com/general67/einn.htm
2006-07-08 18:43:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by D 4
·
5⤊
2⤋
on an identical time as I agree that Bush has no longer been the worst president in American background, to call him between the main suitable is slightly untimely. The enterprise of "reliable Christian Values" interior the White homestead will flow away with him. Any enterprise he made is non everlasting and the legacy would be short-lived and remembered in a different way in line with who follows and how Iraq ultimately settles. The lengths Bush has long gone to guard this united states could or won't have overstepped some barriers. i've got faith in a time of conflict that he could do this and be completely superb with it, besides the fact that, as quickly as the conflict has ended, if the measures he put in place do no longer stand to reason or our shape it may desire to all be for naught. The tax cuts helped better than basically the midsection type. maximum all of us benefited from it, in spite of the undeniable fact that those no longer used to a providence in all probability did no longer comprehend what to do with it. i'm no longer as particular it "saved the monetary gadget" besides the fact that it particularly did help pull us out of a recession. Many presidents have attempted courses for the academic gadget...different than placed greater emphasis on the basics. Bush's software provides a manner of measuring, yet whilst colleges concentration greater on the attempt than the educational of the youngsters, there's a situation.
2016-12-14 05:47:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I was thinking that when Obrador lost.
On the one hand I think he is volatile and would be an uncomfortable neighbor.
On the other, I don't think business would want to get so cozy with him through the North American Union.
spp.gov
2006-07-08 19:18:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by DAR 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe a president that hated America would at least be someone we could deal with as long as the agenda was known, ie, hating America. It is easier to deal with someone who you "know" than it is a "friend" who you dont truly know.
2006-07-09 00:14:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by renegadesho_ban 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who cares if Mexico would be better? If you are worried about Mexico, go back.
2006-07-09 02:30:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe,then you'd be just like America!!!! I don't think there can be a president any more psycho than good 'ol George W.Bush!!!
2006-07-09 22:59:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Fluttery 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that we (U.S.A., Canada, and Mexico) are going to turn into the next European Union.
2006-07-08 18:42:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Disillusioned 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
mexico would be better off if they had a diffrent goverment that made economic times better. there so they wouldnt have to flea overhere.
2006-07-08 18:42:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The US already has one of those as its own president.
2006-07-08 18:42:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mexico would be better off without Mexicans, I can tell you that much.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
I can tell you right now that is why they aren't doing anything to stop illegal immigration.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
2006-07-08 18:41:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋