English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Sure would put an end to a lot of disparity.

2006-07-08 18:28:30 · 18 answers · asked by Rick 7 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

fairi_nece... I asked the question more or less hypothetically. I'm not sure that means its irrelevant.

2006-07-09 01:42:59 · update #1

18 answers

That's what I believe. I never believed that "God is everywhere" type thing. I think he started the Big Bang and then just stepped back to let us run ourselves. He pops in every now and then to stir up a hurricane or tornado and see how we handle it then goes about his business. He probably has a million other planets of people to attend to.

2006-07-08 18:31:41 · answer #1 · answered by chica_zarca 6 · 2 0

Not in the way Darwinian evolutionist say. For example they still don't have any idea how life started, but they are quick to say that it could not have involved any higher power. Why? true science does not start out by dismissing possibilities before the evidence is examined. However today that is exactly what most scientist do. As a result they ignore any evidence for a creator. Religion on the other hand does not dispute micro evolution, that is the small changes within a species. There is ample evidence to show that over a period of time animals have changed a little. What ther is not evidence to support is the belief that everything came from a single cell organism.
Furthermore if evolutionist want to claim that God did not create the animals, then they should also be ready to explain the creation of the universe. The big bang theory that we were all told was really a fact, has now been shown to have serious flaws. Scientist now readily admit that there are problems with this theory.

2006-07-08 19:04:25 · answer #2 · answered by unicorn 4 · 0 0

No, I don't think so, because a big part of Genesis is the position that death did not exist until the sin of Adam and Eve. If evolution preceeded this, then so did death.

The sad thing is, that even ancient Jews and early Christians knew Genesis was symbolic in nature. It's only fairly recently that Christains have forgotten their orgins and now take such an obvious fable as literal.

2006-07-08 18:54:08 · answer #3 · answered by lenny 7 · 0 0

Couldn't Man have created God? Hmmm, there's an intelligent explanation. But forget about that, let's spend another 2000 years trying to explain how the concept of God really does make sense! When you brainwash God into little human beings, they grow up believing in God. At some point, with most of them, there is some brain activity. Of course, that causes problems for 'the believers' so we get these ridiculous explanations of God and his "mysterious" ways. Like the Tsunami wiping out hundreds of thousands of his precious humans. What was God doing that day? You still believe in Santa Clause and the Easter bunny too?

2006-07-08 18:40:16 · answer #4 · answered by TheNuts 1 · 0 0

I believe that is pretty much what happened. However, I don't totally agree with evolution. For example... if we evolved from apes, why do we still have apes? Ok answering a question with a new one... lol.

A lifetime for us is but a blink of God's eye, so what we say was created over a billion years could easily have been a day to God. The Bible said Earth was created in 7 days - whose time measurement?

2006-07-08 18:36:40 · answer #5 · answered by curiouschick18 4 · 0 0

That is THE best suggestion I've ever heard about the theory of evolution...Its a shame to see how controversial religion vs science is...Like it says in the book by Dan Brown, Angels and Demons, science is God's canvas...Why can't people see that science and religion are in fact two of the same kind?

I personally support the religious side of the creation of man, but i affirmatively believe the existence and the reasoning behind the theory of evolution...Instead of dismissing either side, why not see it as yin and yang?

There is clearly a higher source of energy behind the initiation of science and all of its occurences...It puzzles me how scientists won't admit to that...It's not as if it would deter their research or purpose of studying life and its beginning...They might realize that it is the very factor that might empower them to find an actual path to aknowledging the origin of species and life, instead of reaching dead ends or ending up with missing links...

2006-07-08 18:39:35 · answer #6 · answered by callmemisscutie 3 · 0 0

No. This concept doesn't make sense. If you believe in evolution you can't believe in Adam and Eve. If you believe in God (the God of the Bible) you can't believe in evolution. For me the only match is consider that the Big Bang is God.

2006-07-08 18:36:28 · answer #7 · answered by Lost. at. Sea. 7 · 0 0

an Anunaki created the Adams race to mine gold for them the symbolic story of Adam was about the cloning and genetic engineering .

and it was not one guy but a whole race

and he was known as the creator ,but he was not a God
have you just arrived from the dark ages ,not to be aware of that.I heard that Americans lived in restricted intellectual conditions ,guess just didn't realize by how much.

And cro magnum,Neanderthaler ,homo erectus .etc all lived at the same time ,and in the same place
they must have been Anunaki try out ,until he perfected it into homo sapian ,well almost perfect ,they left most of the brain inactive ,so that they could control their little used minds easier.

2006-07-08 18:39:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, he could have done so.

Having said that is relevant to note that ...

There is no evidence that proves Atheistic MacroEvolution (without Intelligent Design)...

I used to believe in Evolution. However, over a period of time I have grown skeptical of the claims of Macro*Evolution... this is largely due to the weakness of the evidence for Macro*Evolution, and the fact that the evidence, rationally interpreted does not support the overarching claims made by Macro*Evolutionists...

For scientific and intellectual critiques of evolution, see http://www.godsci.org/gsi/apol/evo/00.html .

Cordially,
John

2006-07-08 18:32:29 · answer #9 · answered by John 6 · 0 0

No, the Bible teaches that before the first sin of Adam and Eve (eating the forbidden fruit), there was no death, pain, or suffering of anything considered "nephesh", which basically means animals. So, evolution COULD NOT have happened before the first sin.

2006-07-08 18:33:54 · answer #10 · answered by snodrift777 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers