are there ad-libs or omission for convenience
2006-07-08 18:23:56 · 6 answers · asked by HEY boo boo 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Languages
hmmm that says a lot doesn't it?
(psst sunshine -- I love that song!)
2006-07-08 18:31:17 · answer #1 · answered by anonymous 6 · 3⤊ 6⤋
Henry VIII was not the first to have the Bible translated in English, this had been done centuries before during Old English times in the 10th century. Henry VIII was the king of England when the printing press arrived, and one of the first things to be printed was a Bible. None of the kings of England were actively involved in Bible translation other than providing money for the process. The Bible published during Henry's reign was NOT ad-libbed or cut for convenience.
2006-07-09 03:19:48 · answer #2 · answered by Taivo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How in the world did he find time to do that? Didn't he get married to the widow next door? You know, that woman who got married seven times before.
2006-07-08 18:29:50 · answer #3 · answered by I am Sunshine 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it was one way to get the English hooked onto all that mind control,few could read Latin
in fact few could read at that time
videos would have been a better idea
or is that tooo sick for you.
2006-07-08 18:27:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably just as many as in the original versions.
2006-07-08 20:37:31 · answer #5 · answered by J9 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hey...u just watched that episode on history channel didn't u.....I just saw it this afternoon....wasn't it a good episode....yeah then you have the King James version
2006-07-08 18:25:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋