English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

5 answers

Lung cancer with liver mets has a 5 yr survival rate of less than 1%, To be honest, this is when the cancer pt has to decide whether to enjoy the time they have left or to pursue treatment which usually does not have a favorable outcome.

2006-07-08 18:20:46 · answer #1 · answered by happydawg 6 · 0 0

Dont waste your money and kill your selft going through traditional medicine...The gov and the drug comp are here only to make money not to help us....
Please visit the link below, Dr Holts radiowave therapy... He has been treating patients with terminal cancer that were otherwise given months to leave and are still alive to tell you about it...
He treatment is the miracle we've been waiting for, side affect free and inexpensive, perhaps this is the reason they do not want to accept his treatment..You see they stand to loose a lot of money..
Check the link out and pass the word around there is cure there is hope there is living....
www.the-institute.com.au

2006-07-10 02:03:22 · answer #2 · answered by Spellbinder 3 · 0 0

The prognosis is most likely grave.

2006-07-09 02:51:28 · answer #3 · answered by mr.answerman 6 · 0 0

if the cancer has metastasized, then it's bad news

2006-07-12 22:20:07 · answer #4 · answered by Ellen N 4 · 0 0

does not seem to be good. sorry

2006-07-08 22:24:47 · answer #5 · answered by canary 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers