English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i mean you guys got a set of balls in your pants why do you need the ones in are shirt

2006-07-08 13:28:23 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships Singles & Dating

24 answers

Really, I don't get it either. Boobs are just skin filled with fatty tissue! Not so sexy.

2006-07-08 13:33:46 · answer #1 · answered by ~•over the moon•~ 4 · 1 0

There are clearly two significant zones of the human body in which physical differences exist between men and women. The chest area and the hips. This is true in general in almost every animal.

Since a woman (of any species) is never continously fertile, she had to develop signals to get the man aroused during the times that she was. Animals developed this signal in the buttocks (if you think about it, there is really no reason to have a butt since few animals sit like we do). When a woman was fertile, her buttocks swelled and sometimes changed colors to show prospective men that she was able to mate.

As humans began to walk upright, the women who could only signal with their buttocks started being selected out. As silly as it sounds, frankly the man simply couldn't see the underside of her buttocks to know whether she was fertile or not.

In the place of this woman, a different type of woman with very large round "cleavage-liked, buttocks-shaped" woman started being selected because the men mistook her breasts for the buttocks based signals they had evolved over years to desire.

Simultaneosly, two things happened - one was that a woman's "real ability to be fertile" became hidden, so that the men who were only prepared to mate at fixed times died away not being able to time themselves. At the same time, women's substitute signal, her breasts, ended up attracting men all the time (your breasts don't change in prominense the way your buttocks might).

So the natural evolution of humans was to have men be very very aroused and be continously aroused to a woman's breasts even though there is actually no real point for being so, since the real mating part of a human is in the lower body.

Meanwhile, of course, breasts also continue their function as being an organ that feeds the young of the species. This function has nothing to do with a man's desire.

2006-07-08 13:40:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You can't compare the balls in the pants to a woman's boobs. To me the best boobs are a fine Latina Girl, with nice boobs not too big or too small. if she wears the right bra we are in paradise with her boobs.

There are those that have some nice mango shape boobs and they fill nice and firm to the tough. How many of you guys have gone out with a chick with nice boobs in a tight bra to make them even more sexy !

2006-07-08 13:39:41 · answer #3 · answered by Premio 4 · 0 0

Here's the deal. I'm a total leg or a&& guy. I never care about br****s. It's always, always below the belt.
However, every now and then, and I mean rarely, I encounter a girl and I am total sucked in by her chest. Fascinated, titilated etc. The single encounter may end, and not even thinking about it (cause I'm not a br**** guy), ten minutes later, BAM!, they're all I can think about. All I can think about is touching her br***s.

2006-07-08 13:39:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Something Else To Slide In Between

2006-07-08 13:38:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well hey, if you had a choice between boobs or balls (from an aesthetic standpoint) which would you choose? Boobs are generally more attractive than a hairy scrotum...LOL!

2006-07-08 13:34:21 · answer #6 · answered by . 7 · 0 0

Those boobs are not balls....two..er, different things. I'm not a fan of HUGE boobs..but a regular to small pair are sure sexy for some reason.

2006-07-08 13:31:56 · answer #7 · answered by merlin_steele 6 · 0 0

It's instinct. They kept us alive from like birth to 2 years old, so we feel that we owe them a certain amount of respect and admiration once we age.

2006-07-08 13:30:54 · answer #8 · answered by bigsnowtoday 2 · 0 0

That depends on the man...Some men like big breast, others like big bottoms, some like thick legs, and still some like ugly fat chicks...Still other men like ladies who are small and sexy...It really depends on the man...but I will remind you beauty is in the EYE of the beholder and it is only SKIN deep!!!!

2006-07-08 13:39:04 · answer #9 · answered by newyorkcitypimp1 3 · 0 0

We like to play with things - balls and boobs - it's all goooood!!!

2006-07-08 13:32:44 · answer #10 · answered by tspbrady 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers