Was 9/11 Attacks An Invention Of Neo-Conservatives?

Question

Bush invoked the “War on Islam”, as a dictum of power, not reason and wisdom, to camouflage the prospective future with acts of barbarity and to dispel the notion of accountability in global affairs. Historically, people and nations pursuing this path of behavior have ended up in self-defeat and self-destruction.

The 9/11 attacks and religious doctrines have no common ground. Hourly paid intellectuals turned guardian of approved truth, allege that Islam breeds terrorism. The Western mass media complements the scientifically discovered notion to poison the public perceptions and source of judgments against the Arabs and Muslims. The Neo-Conservatives helped to rob the humanity of its human heritage. The perception of ‘radical Islam’ was invented and enhanced by the ‘fear’ of terrorism and as a precursor to attack Muslims.

Answer 1

Thank you for your most wise and noble perception of reality. The American Christian Fundamentalist movement and their lackeys in the CIA and the military planned, funded and executed the 9/11 attacks in order to foment their plans to destroy Islam. But their plans are coming to nothing as the American congress and the American news media are undercutting the very pillars that support this new Crusade of America. 'Radical' Muslims are only radicalised because the infidel Westerners have abused, defrauded, killed and oppressed Muslim populations for many years. As you say in America, "Payback is a *****".

Answer 2

It is my firm opinion that the '9/11' attack and the Twin Towers falling was faked.

The 'defense deparpment ' and the military industry needed a war to justify themselves and the enormous subsities they were recieving and they need an enemy that could not be firmly defined so that they could never really be found and the 'war' ended.
They got what they wanted.

I have worked in the residential reconstuction business and have seen how wooden 1 & 2 story buildings have fallen. One in particular was close to my parents home and the owner had several propane tanks in the garage that appaently leaked and when the hot water heater lighted it ignited propane gas in the garage. The result was an explosion that supposedly threw the garage door across the street. The fire ignited the tires of the car and melted a lot of things (glass, light duty shelves[possibly aluminum ?], 'plastics?') but no heavy steel (frig,cabinets', tools, etcetera), The fire burned for over an hour even though the fire department was there within minutes. That building was a single story wood structure and it burned for over an hour before falling (incrementally) and it did not fall straight down so how is it that a steel structure that is built to withstand being hit by large aircraft fall straight down?

Steel melts at over 2000 degrees fahrenheit ,aircraft fuel (kerosine) burns at less than 1600 degrees and most if not all was flashed away when the plane hit the tower ( images of the second impact ). All that was left to burn was people and furniture (wood burns at 400 degrees) hardly capable of reaching the 2000 degrees necessary to melt steel.

Even if the resulting fire was capable of melting the steel then the Tower should have first bulged out before failing and even then the planes hit one side and if the steel failed that side would have failed first (even if just milli seconds) the result would be that the tower would fallen toward that side (they would NOT have fallen straight down).

Prior to the twin towers NO steel stucture has failed due to fire that I am aware of. The Empire State building was hit by a B17 and it still stands! There have been several very large fires in large steel sturctures in the past with the loss of many lives due to the fact that there was no way for those people to escape. Gimmick's of all sorts were invented to help people trapped in burning sky scrappers. BUT NONE of these building fell as a result of these fires.

The media has been totally compliant with the republican administration and reports what these people want and the way they want it reported. One glaring example is their reporting of President Clintons prior business dealings and personal life while for the most part ignoring Mr. Bushes past business and past personal life (even though it seemed to be a great deal more thought-provoking).

In my opinion there are far too many inconsistencies for the '9/11' thing to not be rigged.

Answer 3

Well the 9/11 attacks did happen. You must not have a tv, radio, or internet access at the time to have missed it. Do you live under a rock?

The terroist themselves have admitted this is a holy war. Now I don't belive that the actions of the few make up an entire religion. All that is is like you said fear. People are scared.


Islam inteslf is not the most peacful of religions, I don't think any are, not even christianity, and I am a christian. maybe you yourself should try doing more research. Maybe you need to read the koran to see for yourself. They are, as far as I know one of the most judgemntal religions when it comes to non belivers.

Oh and I guess I should add that I don't like bush, and think he is an idiot.

Answer 4

A lot of liberals claim 9/11 and the Iraq war being a conspiracy by the government. To me, these are no better proved than a claim of a conspiracy of the government hiding aliens. Of course, I myself reside on the left of the political spectrum it is difficult for me to give myself over to something I don't wholey believe in. I need more proof than most people offer. As for the Islamic religion, we all understand that the base of the religion is violence. Though, Christianity along with other religions, are not exactly peaceful. We have to understand that there should always be freedom of religion, as long as that freedom does not harm freedom to live. If someone wants to be Islamic, that's great. If someone wants to kill, that's not.

Frankly, maybe 9/11 was planned by Neo-Conservatives in America today. Maybe not. I don't believe it, yet, and I may never not. We'll see. As of right now, I'm skeptical.

Answer 5

Nope
They have always being there lurking, ready to strike, the fact that Bush took advantage of this a started the war of OIL, was just that an oportunity that open, and he will keep up anywhere that there is something to be taken, to get the economy going, this war and wars to come have dolars sings on them.

This is not about God and religion, is about money, and foer those contrys that are in their path is very grim outllook on the next few years.

Just keep on watching them you will see a pather there where ever there is something to be taken, the dictators, and regimes just make the perfect excuse, he will go after them, to liberate something else, to protect something else, to...............,
but tis is the type of argument that only years down the road ill answer.

But the terrorist will keep coming that is their nature,
they will kill inoccents and call it a work of God and holy
and a lot more nonsense.

And they will always be basters ready to make profit from it.

Answer 6

You are overthinking this.
From the terrorist point of view- America is supporting despotic AND non-Islamic(sharia) based governments in the middle east via our oil purchases. In order to overthrow those governments and unite the middle east in a holy Islamic government, they must push the west to stop buying Oil. (this has not worked, quite the opposite)

From our current Administrations view: The Saudi government was at risk of overthrow because of public opposition to the American military base left over from Gulf War times. It was thought we could remove that base and overthrow Saddam Hussein and put a base in Iraq to protect our oil interests in the region instead. Also, we could sell the Iraqi oil fields on the open market to the highest bidder(Halliburton) and use the proceeds to rebuild Iraq's infrastructure(halliburton) - (This also has not worked)
Osama is still free and the Taliban are regrouping. Entirely too much overthinking .

Answer 7

yes you are right. The bombing of the Kenya embassy was also a Neo-Conservative invention as was the 1st attempt to blow up the World Trade Center during the Clinton administration. The Muslims started a war and now they are getting their asses kick and are trying to blame it on others.

Get a life

Answer 8

When did anyone invoke a war on Islam? Why are you making up stories to slander Bush? Now you are going to make people think that those who are Islamists are also liars which many did not believe (until now).
You are also now making Islamist sympathizers appear anti-US, anti-truth and propagandists which many did not believe (until now).
Bin Laden declared war on the US in a documented communication to his followers and invoked Allah and Islam to complete the demise of the US. Look it up. You have internet access.

Answer 9

Beautifully written! So, what's the question? Did neocons invent 9/11? Yes, I admit, I did it with remote control from an hour and a half south. I just got lucky with the towers collapsing. For someone who writes so well, it's kind of a shame that it lacks any semblance of intelligence.

Answer 10

Go to New York and look at the hole in the ground . I guarantee that yo can still smell the cooked bodies since you're nto used to being there. Like W said bud - you are either for us or against us. A simpler truth does not exist.