English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Am sorry to reflect my point of view this way and be so honest...
U can never imagine what is going on in Iraq... u American people think that Bush is right and Arabs are wrong... u think that these young children deserve to die because they are Arabs or u can say Muslims... Media is corrupted... Media wants u American guys to think and see what is beyond the fact what is false...
Arabs are people Muslims are people...
In addition... some people decided to be terrorists that doesn’t mean all the Muslims are terrorists....
It is all the mater of Oil Bush doesn’t care about innocent people as much as OIL, Media promotes the pictures of terrorists and bad Muslim guys but it doesn’t promote the pictures of what are the American soldiers doing in Iraq and how are they killing, raping .and murdering thousands of people and kids...

2006-07-08 11:18:16 · 25 answers · asked by Cutebessi 2 in Politics & Government Military

25 answers

It appears that you seem to have a personal vendetta against the US. How many arabs were in the world trade center when it was attacked. The terrorists didn't attack white christian americans they attacked all people from all walks of life, that is what many people fail to realize. I know that not all muslims are terrorists. I know that not all muslims are so radical in there ideals. And I also know that the persecution of arabs is unjust and unfair. It is a sad truth. During WWII thousands of Japanese-Americans were rounded up and put into camps. Be very thankful that this has not occured for Arab-Americans.I do not support the war in Iraq, and most of America agrees. Recent investigations into the Haditha massacre may finally give justice to those who perished, and open up new cases of misconduct. Check out this link

2006-07-19 17:02:56 · answer #1 · answered by darthevilicus 2 · 0 0

No I don't, I think it is because a sitting president had such a hard-on to start a conflict with Iraq, he went right along fault CIA intelligence reports, alleged WMDs (which to this day have not been found), rumored al Qaeda connection because a few of the 9/11 terrorist had ties to Iraq. I will say this much, I do believe Saddam Hussein may not be directly involved with 9/11 but probably endorsed those actions

2006-07-21 11:10:30 · answer #2 · answered by rampdogg2000 2 · 0 0

LOL, Honest??? You wouldn't know honest of Allah laid it on you head. What is happening in Iraq began with Saddam. Now he's gone, a new freely elected government with their new freely elected voted and approved constitution is trying to take hold. The terrorist are the ones targeting the innocent civilians. You must think we are stupid. You think because you can write on this site and throw phrases of bush bashing and oil, and ohhhh for the kids sakes, we're innocent, not all Muslims are terrorist...sob....sob... I'm not buying your story, I am 110% sure this is all bullshit that you write, and you are a terrorist trying to sway public opinion. We are all not John Kerry, some of us actually have a brain. You however do not. Strap it on and go kill more innocent Iraqi and meet more maker and your virgins. Jerk.

2006-07-08 11:31:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'm curious about a few things. You make America out to be bad Muslim hating and Arab killing country. How many of your fellow Muslims were killed by other Muslims? George Bush will be gone in 2008, but how many leaders in the Arab world are elected by their own people? How many have stepped own after 8 years? Why is it Muslims denounce civilians that are killed ACCIDENTALY by U.S. forces but stay silent when their fellow Muslim INTENTIONALY kill them? Why is it worse when a lone soldier rapes a girl than when a Muslim religious leader sanctions the gang rape of a teen? Why is it that the Arab world has the highest concentration of dictators in the world? Why is it that Iraqis, when given their first taste of freedom from tyranny responded by looting their own government buildings and national treasures? Why is it Iraqi Shiites and Iraqi Sunnis would rather kill each other and live in a war zone than cooperate and live in peace? Etc.etc.etc
The U.S. is far from perfect, but Arab world, as a whole, is no position to remark on our deficiencies when they have more going against them then for them. You should direct your criticism inward before you direct it outward. I believe it is called "Itjihad" or "the greater Jihad"

2006-07-08 11:57:36 · answer #4 · answered by joeybagofdonnuts 3 · 0 0

Please don't criticise the American soldiers in Iraq if you don't have proof to do so. They aren't murdering thousands of people, maybe a few soldiers killed a few innocent people, and they will be judged for it.

Overall, the military in Iraq is doing an honourable job (I've been to Iraq and so has my wife). The media only presents the bad aspects of the war because they want sensational stories.

2006-07-08 11:35:05 · answer #5 · answered by Eric Morrison 1 · 0 0

properly, first, the U. S. isn't in Iran or Syria, so our efforts in Iraq have no longer something to do with what those international places do. second, there is no longer multiple information (both way) that what we are doing has any significant impact on what terrorists outside Iraq are doing. Or for that celebrate, on what terrorists interior Iraq are doing. that's sheer hypothesis (must be authentic, ought to now) that the insurgents struggling with antagonistic to US forces in Iraq ought to unexpectedly commence attacking US cities if the U. S. left. extra likely, that they had proceed their very personal civil conflict without interference from us. and those terrorists who're making plans on hitting the U. S. or Europe likely are not spending their days planting IEDs alongside Iraqi highways. they're already foreign places making plans their attacks. So, that's surprisingly arguable no matter if our presence in Iraq is having any bring about the route of preventing different terrorist attacks outside Iraq. finally, look at it from a cost-earnings attitude. how a lot funds (1000's and 1000's) and what number lives (dozens) did it value for the U. S. to invade Iraq and topple Saddam's authorities . how a lot funds (tens of billions) and what number lives (1000's) has it value for the U. S. to stay in Iraq and attempt to stress them to examine a clean authorities. Which, by employing the way, is nowhere on the point of being waiting to take over their us of a. What we'd want to continually have executed is pull out after "challenge performed" and allow Iraq to examine regardless of authorities it needed. If we did not like the outcomes, we bypass in, topple it, and tell them to attempt back. lets have executed that 10 circumstances and nevertheless spent in ordinary words a million% of the money and lost a million% of the lives that we've so a procedures lower than the present plan. So, regardless of the aims, the potential we are employing to finish them are surprisingly wasteful of both aspects and American lives. And from any attitude, stupid potential at the instantaneous are not a strong thanks to achieve any aims.

2016-11-06 01:47:40 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I was in Baghdad and worked with Iraqi people, some were the nicest people I have ever met in my life, to hear stories of what life was like under Saddam, would make the hardest person come to tears. We have spent alot of money there both US taxpayer and Iraqi money and have not too much to show for it. I dont know who is to blame but know ABSOLUTELY we could rebuild that country much faster and cheaper if they didnt shoot us and bomb us. Imagine that the monthly salary in Iraq is $400 and 1 armored vehicle a toyota 4 runner cost $175,000.00 we could put many more Iraqis to work if we didnt need to buy armor. As for killing and raping, it is blown out of proportion, How many were killed and raped under Saddam ?? If the Iraqis trully want to take control of the country stop the violence we have said we will leave when you can self govern

2006-07-22 11:19:04 · answer #7 · answered by johnman142 6 · 0 0

Please don't attack all Americans
There are many Americans who think that way - I see them on television everyday. They are morons, they led us into this war and most Americans know that now... but all too late
Most Muslims are followers of Islam, a religion as noble as any other
But Bush isn't the powerful man doing it. It is the religious right, the idealistic Americans with no sense of foreign rights

The media needs to stop scaring Americans and start telling them the truth

2006-07-08 11:26:03 · answer #8 · answered by MrPotatoHead 4 · 0 0

i think that we are just trying to establish peace (or as much as there can be in an individualistic world) in the world. i do not condone the raping and killing of innocent people. i do not think that all arabic/muslim people are bad. we are not in Iraq because of Terrorism, we are over there because we were threatened by their now overthrown dictator and we are attempting to stablize their economy as best we can before withdrawling form Iraq.

2006-07-08 12:46:12 · answer #9 · answered by punkswimmer07 1 · 0 0

It couldnt be about terrorism because none of the 911 hijackers was from iraq.it's all about money and oil and a president with a john wayne attitude.

2006-07-22 10:18:56 · answer #10 · answered by Tony G. 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers