2006-07-08 10:38:11 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
So far consensus says "NO"...and I concur as well.
Unknown repercussions are bound to follow, and we already have more going on than we even need to be dealing with.
2006-07-08 11:48:09 · answer #1 · answered by JC 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If we are going to attack North Korea, I believe nuke or two will be necessary to send them a clear message that we mean business. If we are going to do this we need to do it soon before North Korea develops an atomic arsenal and retaliate by bombing South Korea or Japan or even here in the states!!
2006-07-14 18:26:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bomb North Korea? Why? What did they do to you?
2006-07-08 10:45:54 · answer #3 · answered by Bapboy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What are you some kind of sicko or something? A nuclear war would spell the end of life on this planet. The problems we have with global warming would seem like a Sunday School picnic compared to what would happen if we unleashed nuclear weapons.
2006-07-08 14:25:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO!!! Are you nuts??? Korea is a non-entity. Their missiles don't work and we have troops on their border. NK just wants some concessions to give up their missiles. This one will be solved by diplomacy.
2006-07-08 10:48:59 · answer #5 · answered by olderandwiser 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No- too many people would die in South Korea.
2006-07-08 10:41:54 · answer #6 · answered by hope 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, let's kill millions because of 1 person.
2006-07-09 11:51:23 · answer #7 · answered by Bill 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
naw... those are too big and will kill them too fast.... we need to make them suffer.... maybe switch to chemical?... and y is everyone being hippy's... diplomacy barly ever works unless we threaten them with full scale violence
2006-07-08 10:42:32 · answer #8 · answered by Dont get Infected 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why? what good would that do
2006-07-08 11:11:16 · answer #9 · answered by jakeybird2000 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋