I think that they should be stoned in public. Think about this. If they are convicted. They should put them on pay per view for $19.95. You could charge $5 a rock with no purchase limits. (Family members and victims get 20 for free). Place a cage over their groin and head and make them run the gauntlet. All of the proceeds go to Educational systems, Better prisons, and the needy. I bet if those wackos saw that, they would stay in their little closets and think about 1,000 times about their sick needs before acting out. If they make out alive (Minimum 1,000 stones) they could go in to a pool (Like survivors) and run the Super Gauntlet played on National T.V. at the Super Bowl (think of all of the money wagered on that) winner gets a free ticket to some place like Siberia.
2006-07-08 10:44:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Boredstiff 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
No because it wouldn't work. Its an act of sick control. Castration wouldn't stop them from hurting children. Another means of torture would be used instead. It might even frustrate the molester to the point of murder.
There is five states that on the second offense the predator is put to death. I don't know if that would be a good enough of a deterrent for these people but at least no more children would be victimized. All states should implement the death penalty in cases of child molestation
2006-07-08 10:52:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by fingerpuppytoe 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Castrating sexual predators will not solve the problem. Child molesters need to be imprisoned for life or get the death penalty if they have molested children numerous times.
Or place some type of tracking device underneath the skin that cannot be removed.
2006-07-08 10:42:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by cutiepie 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. What the judicial system does not realize is that sexual predators, particularly child molestors, do not get better, they will not stop. If they feel they can get away with it, they will go for it. And yes, woman can be castrated too, same organ. That doesn't necesarily mean the crimes will stop because not all offenders use their sexual organs in their crime. Cut their hands off and they won't do it again.
2006-07-08 10:39:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by aurelie_moineau 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Although it is a great idea, it really is not going to solve the problem. Often these acts are more than sexual - they represent some control issues. If the individual fantasizes along with the act, would we cut out their brain to solve the problem? I personally think anyone who harms a child should be put to death, but that is not really my decision.
2006-07-08 10:40:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by physandchemteach 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is such a thing as chemical castration. You give the person a shot, and they can't get it up, or get off. It also removes most desires to have sex. I would love to see that happen to these people.
2006-07-08 10:37:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by natex14 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes we should but that should only be a part of the sentence he should get life imprisonment, as out in the streets he could still prey on kids, when a person is a danger to society , he needs to be put into solitary confiment where hes a way from society
2006-07-08 11:40:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by cluelesskat maria 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know. If there is proof that castration is a deterent, maybe it should be considered on a case by case basis.
2006-07-08 10:38:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Child predators have no right to even live.
2006-07-08 10:37:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by Caesar 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think this will solve anything. Most people are child molesters that do it with their hands. Removing their testicals won't solve anything. These people are sick in the head maybe they should have their brains removed instead
2006-07-08 11:23:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Durty 2
·
0⤊
0⤋