There is no proof.
2006-07-08 09:59:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, there is none. All Intelligent Design is, is Creationism concealed in new package labeled science.
Intelligent Design used to be called 'scientific creationism'. Courts ruled that there was nothing scientific about it, and that it could not be taught as 'science' in public schools. So, they revamped it by substituting 'unknown creator' for 'god', and renamed it 'Intelligent Design' (ID).
ID arguments have never been published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. ID makes no scientific claims of its own. All it does, all it CAN do, is take pot shots at evolution and at cosmology. It is not science at all.
The ID proponents are not trying to win on the scientific front... that is a canard. They are trying to win in the PUBLIC forum, by means of falsely discrediting science, and making it out to be the enemy of religion, knowing full-well that the members of their constituency is too stupid and/or too intellectually lazy to learn the facts on their own.
One of their primary tools of deception are 'quote mining'... that is, taking scientists words out-of-context and presenting them in such a way that they seem to discredit science, often in a way that is the exact opposite of what the scientist actually said.
Another tool of deception is the intentional misinterpretation and misrepresentation of scientific data. And finally, out-right lies. Gish is particularly noteable in that regard.
ID is built upon the logical fallacy 'argument from incredulity'; i.e., I can't understand how that could happen, therefore, it didn't happen... god did it."
2006-07-08 17:11:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
When a human male sperm and female egg unite... a zygote is started and it developes into an embryo... into a fetus... into a neonatal human being... into a human baby... It takes a full 40 weeks for this intelligent design to go from beginning to fulfillment... would you not call this process... INTELLIGENT DESIGN? If it is a process of our human species... could not this same intelligent design be used through out creation too... The development of a human baby from two cells into a fully mature baby is an intelligent design of the evolution of life... Lots to think about there...?????
2006-07-08 17:28:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Callie Kitty 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Can you seriously look around you, see how complex and fragile our bodies are and think for a moment that a sonic boom millions of years ago did all this? Yes, the bible is hard to prove, but many of the histrical facts are true. They all fall in line. This is all a test of your faith. You can't see faith, but you know it's there. Seeing isn't believing, Believing is seeing.
2006-07-08 17:27:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jean S 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bible quotes are the only cold hard facts.
The rest is arguments about complexity of life and how it couldn't have occured naturally.
2006-07-08 16:59:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Einstein spoke of ID to explain what he saw in the universe that science could not. Some scientist scoffed at him then, many are re-thinking that idea.
2006-07-08 17:07:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
bible qoutes AREN'T facts, but the proof is in the pudding, as complex as the universe (not just this planet) is do you LOGICALLY think that something so complex can happen by accident?
2006-07-08 17:00:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by thirteen_fox 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
ID was made up by men so that they could teach creationism in schools. It is false, and should never be discussed as being true ever again.
2006-07-08 17:00:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by azmurath 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Study the details of ID. Learn about the complexity of the motor.
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.arn.org/docs/mm/flag_dithani.gif&imgrefurl=http://www.arn.org/docs/mm/fdsmall.htm&h=150&w=200&sz=1262&hl=en&start=3&tbnid=-rDa8kmO1uO8LM:&tbnh=74&tbnw=99&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dflagellum%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26sa%3DN
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.nanonet.go.jp/english/mailmag/2004/files/011a4s.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.nanonet.go.jp/english/mailmag/2004/011a.html&h=266&w=280&sz=15&hl=en&start=30&tbnid=GHnLqFLWa6PppM:&tbnh=103&tbnw=109&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dflagellum%26start%3D20%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26sa%3DN
Prof. Namba first saw an electron micrograph of the bacterial flagellum and its motor when he was a graduate student. He was surprised to see such complex and sophisticated structure exist in living organisms. It impressed him deep enough to switch his research from muscle to flagella after a while. “Looking at the shape of the flagellar basal body, it is obviously designed to rotate.
2006-07-08 17:04:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by SEOplanNOW.com 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
you are the proof of God
is ineligent design science or religion (I can never remember that one)
2006-07-08 17:00:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by Sarcastic Jesus 2
·
0⤊
0⤋