Are patriots of all races, faiths, and creeds dangerous to world survival?

Question

Islamic radicalist fight for what they believe about religion, politics,and life. They are willing to die for their faith in who they see as God, and what they believe about the world. Are people who are willing to kill and be killed for beliefs, dangerous?

Webster defines a patriot as one who loves and defends his country with ZEAL. Zeal is defined as fanaticism, or extreme enthusiam.

Answer 1

I think your question is way off base. To equate Patriotism with being dangerous is a warped view I wish some teacher did not put in your head. It is that will to support and believe in something that has led to our survival. Those who are weak or act like sheep, get put on a plate next to the mashed potatoes.....

If we took your view The USA would still be British.

Answer 2

Patriots are not dangerous. Fanatics are dangerous.

What's the difference? A patriot thinks their country/culture/religion is wonderful and wants to defend it against those who would destroy it. A patriot is willing to die to defend their country/culture/religion, but would prefer not to have to fight.

A fanatic thinks their country/culture/religion is the absolute best, and anyone who thinks differently is a threat and should be destroyed. A fanatic is willing to be a martyr (or at least to recruit martyrs) to kill others, and prefers to fight to show their devotion.

Patriots are fine. Fanatics are scary. And unfortunately, they can be found in every country and every religion.

Answer 3

The short answer and the long answer both have to be qualified. Yes, fanatics who would impose their wills and their beliefs on others will always be a danger to world AND local peace because people like me will resist them with all our might. One of my favorite quotes is "Death to all tyrants!" That includes the religious as well as the secular.

The long answer is the same with more words.

Answer 4

National patriotism is very different from Religious zeal.

Answer 5

"We carry those truths to be self-glaring, that one and all adult men are created equivalent, that they are endowed by way of their author with particular unalienable rights, that between those are existence, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. "That to guard those rights, governments are instituted between adult men, deriving their merely powers from the consent of the ruled. That each and every time any kind of authorities turns into unfavorable to those ends, it really is the right of the persons to modify or to abolish it, and to institute new authorities, laying its beginning on such concepts and organizing its powers in such kind, as to them shall seem maximum probably to result their protection and happiness." it quite is the creed of a real American patriot. Written by using a liberal, Thomas Jefferson. The liberals of the time supported choosing our own authorities. The conservatives of the time reported to stay with the British authorities, which changed into denying our rights. The Republicans of the 2000s ran a authorities that changed into unfavorable to those ends, and the persons done their excellent to modify it, and instituted a clean authorities. it really is labored out o.k. so a techniques.

Answer 6

I would say necessary.

If you honestly have no beliefs you hold dear enough to kill or be killed over, then you will be a subject to someone elses wills.

Answer 7

Hint - zeal does not equal fanaticism.

Answer 8

The meek shall inherit the Earth.

Answer 9

Well i'm barley christian so i don't feel that whole GOD OR DIE mentallity.... willing to die for you faitha and bellifes no.... but to kill....and irandicate all who don't believe what you do..yes

Answer 10

The most committed wins! So, if that is dangerous, so be it.