English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-08 09:02:16 · 18 answers · asked by Xyligan 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

we lie, steal, betray for sake of all these. don't we?

2006-07-08 09:07:36 · update #1

18 answers

I don't know if it would be better, but I'm pretty sure it would be shorter.

2006-07-08 09:06:05 · answer #1 · answered by Frog Five 5 · 1 0

First to place hunger and thirst which are biological needs with lust (though it could be argued in a sexual way that it too is a biological need, d/k weather you mean it that way though) and desire which is a conceptual need is not necessairly right.

I think you forgot a fundamental human flaw in your question...We are greedy...that want, need, and as you put it...lust/desire to have more is always with us. I think you'd have been better off if you had asked: Would the world be better off without greed?

You also forgot that since we can't ever agree on anything as a majority that the bad things you mention will always be with us.

Having said that yeah...the world would be better if there were always enough to go around for lack of a better way to put it.

2006-07-08 16:15:11 · answer #2 · answered by thebigm57 7 · 0 0

Sometimes it seems that way, but if we felt no desire, lust, hunger or thirst would we still be alive? Relish your feelings it makes you Alive! Remember that we have choices and choose to control your feelings. When feelings rule your life you join our animal friends and we are so much more than animals. With some practice you too can control your feelings and live a full life.

2006-07-08 16:17:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If we felt no desire, lust, hunger or thirst which I guess you would classify as negative, how would we realize the greatness of all the good things in life? There can be no good without evil, no joy without pain. Or at least we would have no way of realizing what it was.

2006-07-08 16:14:19 · answer #4 · answered by royal_fryer 3 · 0 0

Then what would be the point of life if we did not have desire. Lust is fun.
I could live without hunger and thirst.

2006-07-08 16:06:01 · answer #5 · answered by Lexi 5 · 0 0

I don't have much of a sense of desire or lust as far as sexuality is concerned and I'm just fine with that. I actually have a lot less drama in my life than people who do experience a lot of desire and lust!

2006-07-10 22:16:38 · answer #6 · answered by DustInCarroll 4 · 0 0

There would be no life without desire, lust, hunger and thirst

2006-07-08 16:08:19 · answer #7 · answered by NchantingPrincess 5 · 0 0

Of course it would but then how could we learn that desire is both good and bad, how it feels to be hungry and full, the bitter feeling of thirst, and the refreshing feeling of satisfaction. In the end that what we are here to learn the good from the bad in all things.

2006-07-08 16:10:18 · answer #8 · answered by saintrose 6 · 0 0

Funny how you lumped lust (bad) right along in there with desire, hunger, and thirst (not bad).

2006-07-08 16:07:20 · answer #9 · answered by Hyzakyt 4 · 0 0

No because that is where we are tempted and learn our life lessons. We are tempted and it is our choice to stay on God's path or our own, but either way, you learn a lesson and if you didn't learn, well then you'll get that lesson again sometime in the future.

2006-07-08 16:13:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If we lacked all these thing's then we would not be human.
More like robot's.
Why would it be better to have no feeling's. If we did not feel you would not have to ask this question. Feeling feel's good and life is a life long learning prcess.
I love to learn

2006-07-08 16:11:29 · answer #11 · answered by Tiffany 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers