Explain the starting point of evolution. (simply)?

Question

How did it start?

Answer 1

Primordial ooze.

Answer 2

those are completely distinct like 'invention' and 'discovery'. we are able to create something new that isn't latest and we are able to no longer evolute. Evolution is organic which if taken as man made must be referred to as as transformation. extra clarification Dichotomy is branch into 2 aspects or classifications, esp even as they're sharply renowned or antagonistic and also you ask "Why?". As you recognize, the Evolution is asserted to be authentic because there became no longer a time of advent of earth or its lives. All were right here such because the earth and image voltaic device and systematic and organic differences were got here about often times in all aspects of the Universe. consequently the advent is man made and by no potential organic. even as a baby is born, it belongs to the evolution and no you ought to create their children or next era (if so, the volume and high quality of information and different virtues must be developed or maybe flying human beings must be ordinary.

Answer 3

Evolution is strictly a biological science. It has nothing whatsoever to do with or say about the origins of the universe or the world. It has nothing whatsoever to do with the origins of life. It has only to do with the genetic makeup within populations of organisms.

The 'Theory of Evolution' states that the genetic makeup in populations of organisms changes over time, and that the mechanism for those changes is mutation of genetic material (random) operated on by 'natural selection' (NOT random). None of that is in dispute among scientists. It represents a consistent body of scientific fact, extending back almost 150 years, which is well supported by genetics and by the fossil record. There has never been anything found to refute it.

In science, 'theory' is not just 'an idea', as it is in common parlance. In science, a theory is a proposed description, explanation, or model of the manner of interaction of a set of natural phenomena, capable of predicting future occurrences or observations of the same kind, and capable of being tested through experiment or otherwise falsified through empirical observation. Evolution is 'falsifiable'... but in almost 150 years, it NEVER HAS been falsified. As far as 'theories' go, evolution is about the most successful one we've got.

Tthe people who venomously dispute evolution are generally those whose livelihood depends on having large flocks of ignorant believers (sheeple) who do not question what they are told. If those sheeple were to actually begin to think for themselves, and investigate the scientific facts with an open and critical mind, they would at some point begin to realize things like "Hey... this idea that the earth and humans were created over 6 days somewhere between 6,000 and 10,000 years ago is absolute horseshit. The Universe is around 14.6 billion years old, and the earth is around 4.7 billion years old." Or: "Wow... look at that... there is absolutely no evidence in the geological record that there was ever a world-wide flood... and there is plenty of evidence that there was not."

Within the past few decades, astronomers have discovered unimaginally huge clouds of organic chemicals (the 'building blocks of life') in space, in the vicinity of 'stellar nurseries'. This reinforces the idea that life is ubiquitous... not a unique condition associated exclusively with our little planet. In fact, it may be that "when and how did life arise on earth?" may not even be the right question. There is a very real possibility that primitive 'life' was raining down upon the earth over the entire time that it was forming, and for hundreds of millions of years afterward. The REAL question might be "When did conditions on earth settle down enough that life was able to take hold?"

Google for 'panspermia'.

Answer 4

Survival of the fittest is the starting point of the concept of evolution. But 'explain the starting point of life without a god' (which I believe is your intended request) can probably be explained as well as the request to 'explain the starting point of god'.

Answer 5

Yeah really because I'd love to hear that one. It would go something like: "well we all started from these tiny organisms and the earth started from this tiny ball of dust..."
Yep, that's how it would go, but explain to me this: If we started from tiny organisms, who put those organisms there? If the earth started from a small spec of dust, where'd the dust come from? I can't believe anyone would believe in evolution.

Answer 6

First, you must deny God.

After that, you must invent a fantasy to explain the origin of everything. So you take a little bit of truth (mutations within a species) and apply that to a broader realm (evolution of life, evolution of matter, etc.)

Then you sell it to all your buddies who also deny God, and get it published in all the school text books as scientific fact.

Answer 7

Scientists say one possibility is that random atoms floating around RANDOMLY formed a molecule that RANDOMLY hooked up with some more RANDOMLY formed molecules to form RNA which RANDOMLY started producing proteins for a cell.

If you've ever seen a cell you know how complex it is.

THIS -- is why I dont believe in evolution.

Answer 8

There was no "starting point," life has always existed.

The universe is "life" and it never ends, nor did it begin.



This should be easy for bible thumpers:

Where did your creator come from?

The answer to that question is where life (and the universe) came from.

Answer 9

Life on earth began 6000 yrs ago when God breathed the breath of life into Adam. Evolution is a lie of Satan..........

Answer 10

You're trying to link Abiogenesis with Evolution.
The two are mutually exclusive.
Evolution is the process whereby life changes and adapts to new environments.