English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-08 06:18:24 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Botany

15 answers

16... no wait, 10, no, 8... is this a trick question?

2006-07-08 06:23:23 · answer #1 · answered by Q 2 · 0 1

Not nearly enough, but I think more city's should become more like London On. to solve the tree problem... I mean we have at least 5 trees a block here. So that with like 500 blocks, that's over 2500 trees.

2006-07-08 11:06:52 · answer #2 · answered by Eric B 3 · 0 0

in the U.S. there are more tree now than when the first settlers arrived. yourr question is like how many ants are on an acre of earth.. the ans is idunknow.

2006-07-14 16:29:13 · answer #3 · answered by wizard 4 · 0 0

Not NEARLY enough. The world population really MUST start planting thousands of billions of trees to return the planet to a healthy condition.

2006-07-08 07:57:30 · answer #4 · answered by fiddlesticks9 5 · 0 1

In past time there are 2 many but now these they become half..

2006-07-08 08:25:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

To many to count and not enough to withstand getting cut down.

2006-07-08 06:23:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

you are all brainwashed...there are more trees now than 100 years ago

2015-05-26 10:00:34 · answer #7 · answered by walleyemcnabb 1 · 0 0

One less every few seconds

2006-07-08 06:21:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

not as many as there were when I started typing this answer

2006-07-08 06:22:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I got, 2,356,296,582,236. wait now its 2,356,296,582,235, wait, by the time you read this it will be around 2,265,235,626,523

2006-07-08 06:24:36 · answer #10 · answered by wingnut3.1415 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers