Does the smile on a baby's face prove evolution?

Question

Sorry... sometimes I do these sorts of things...

Answer 1

I heard somewhere that all babies are cute so their parents don't eat them. So, it could prove evolution, or at least some survival instinct.

Answer 2

What???

I believe in evolution theory. Science has enough logic to support it.

It may not be exactlly as the modern theory of science but our ancesters thought about the possibilities even thousands of years before.

Sir John Woodroffe, (1865-1936) , Advocate-General of Bengal and sometime Legal Member of the Government of India. He served with competence for eighteen years and in 1915 officiated as Chief Justice. He has said:

"Ages before Lamarck and Darwin it was held in India that man has passed through 84 lakhs (8,400,000) of birth as plants, animals, as an "inferior species of man" and then as the ancestor of the developed type existing to-day. The theory was not, like modern doctrine of evolution, based wholly on observation and a scientific enquiry into fact but was a rather (as some other matters) an act of brilliant intuition in which observation may also have had some part."

The French historian Louis Jacolliot says, "Here to mock are conceit, our apprehensions, and our despair, we may read what Manu said, perhaps 10,000 years before the birth of Christ about Evolution:

'The first germ of life was developed by water and heat.' (Book I, sloka 8,9 )
'Water ascends towards the sky in vapors; from the sun it descends in rain, from the rains are born the plants, and from the plants, animals.' (Book III, sloka 76).

source: Philosophy of Hinduism - By T C Galav

Back to your question-

But , what ??

No direct relation I guess. But more evolved species are able to express more. so I think you can say yes.

Answer 3

Nope :)

There is no evidence that proves Atheistic MacroEvolution (without Intelligent Design)...

I used to believe in Evolution. However, over a period of time I have grown skeptical of the claims of Macro*Evolution... this is largely due to the weakness of the evidence for Macro*Evolution, and the fact that the evidence, rationally interpreted does not support the overarching claims made by Macro*Evolutionists...

For scientific and intellectual critiques of evolution, see http://www.godsci.org/gsi/apol/evo/00.html .

Cordially,
John

Answer 4

It might be possible to prove it is the result of evolution ... then I guess the answer would be yes .

Answer 5

it may not prove evolution, but the first time i saw my son smile it proved that even tough guys can cry.

Answer 6

No, but this question proves you need to get to the liquor store before they close.

It's obvious you've been hitting the bottle pretty hard.

Answer 7

The list of questions can be considerably lengthened, without affecting the monotony of the answers.

Answer 8

It proves that babies like those big, warm, food-providing creatures who hover around them all the time. That's all.

Answer 9

Not sure about that-- but my first thought was, it sure proves a baby's humanity.

Answer 10

It generally proves they have gas.